lmao Firefox billing itself an "indie browser" when poking you to make it the default is straight up disingenuous
I mean, you don't have to say out loud that it's basically Google's anti-antitrust insurance, but let's not err too far on the other side either...
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fasterthanlime@hachyderm.io
y'all, if a non-profit's livelihood depends entirely on one big corporate sponsor... is it indie?
no. no it's not. mozillians know that. only their fan base keeps deluding themselves. and their new marketing plays into that. it's ridiculous and transparent.
(nobody on the fediverse seems too confused about it but my bluesky replies are a trash fire of anger and denial)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fasterthanlime@hachyderm.io
here's where "indie browser" appears in the firefox sources btw, if you thought I straight up made stuff up: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=indie+browser&path=&case=false®exp=false
(it's even preceded by a fun comment)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fasterthanlime@hachyderm.io
and here's a May 2023 article from bloomberg explaining why Google sponsors Firefox, if my original post sounded like a conspiracy theory to you: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-05-05/why-google-keeps-paying-mozilla-s-firefox-even-as-chrome-dominates
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fasterthanlime@hachyderm.io
@fasterthanlime damn, an article from the future? 😄
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jplatte@social.tchncs.de
@jplatte woops, I've been rewatching Back To The Future, my bad
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fasterthanlime@hachyderm.io This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini