Ancestors

Toot

Written by Dani (:cxx: modules addict) on 2025-01-18 at 18:22

Ingesting all the proposals in the recent paper mailing prior to the Hagenberg, Austria WG21 meeting feels like a serious attack on me! 🙁

While the C++26 cycle is approaching a deadline where no more proposals for new features are accepted unless they haven't been discussed before, and already reached a certain stage in the processing pipeline, this doesn't mean work has stopped on those that have.

Quite the contrary. And I need to give more scrutiny to the - sometimes subtle - changes in there to vote on propsals in EWG or plenary with proper knowledge and consideration before they can go into the international standard.

If you are not deterred but rather still interested, you may read all the papers yourself and follow their progress over time. This is an open process. The decision making is not, as it requires comprehensive C++ knowledge to weigh arguments with due diligence. But people are free to introduce additional points of view that may change my own.

BTW, there are rumours that some people in ISO are not happy with the perceived openness of WG14 (i.e. C), WG21 (i.e. C++), and other standardization working groups in SC22. But we try to be as inviting as technically possible.

https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DanielaKEngert@hachyderm.io

Descendants