Ancestors

Toot

Written by Solar 🌄Garden on 2025-01-17 at 14:09

Considering that #misinformation and #disinformation are high on these lists, tracking down just /whose/ opinions these are in this #WEF graphic which comes to me thanks to @petergleick is surprisingly convoluted. Surely, the best way to verify is to find the sources. "Trust us, we know best" is dubious whoever says it.

Here's as far as I am now - "Overview of methodology" in [1] below says "This year’s GRPS has brought together leading insights on the evolving global risks landscape from 1,490 experts across academia, business, government, the international community and civil society" -- and below that, -- "Appendix B: Global Risks Perception Survey 2024-2025 provides more detail on the methodology." [2]

The nitty-gritty of this is that "Survey responses were collected from 2 September to 18 October 2024 from the World Economic Forum’s multistakeholder communities." BUT IT GIVES NO SPECIFICS ON WHO THEY ARE OR HOW THEY ARE INVITED TO TAKE PART. HOWEVER -- breakdowns are given in the graphic linked in the next post 🧵

[1] https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/in-full/overview-of-methodology-1f067be113/

[2]https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/in-full/appendix-b-4d48a70606/#appendix-b-4d48a70606

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wavesculptor@climatejustice.social

Descendants

Written by Solar 🌄Garden on 2025-01-17 at 22:18

[#]wef perception of #risks #survey - the methodology does not give how the specific respondents were invited to take part but gives the following breakdown of them. Link in prev post ref [2]

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wavesculptor@climatejustice.social