Ancestors

Written by Kris on 2025-01-17 at 12:36

Tiktok doch nicht verboten?

Upps, auf den Kuhdraht gepullert?

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from isotopp@infosec.exchange

Written by Kris on 2025-01-17 at 12:39

Und Lacher am Rande:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from isotopp@infosec.exchange

Written by Kris on 2025-01-17 at 12:57

Hier ist die Instagram-Version der Erklärung von Laurahigh5:

https://www.instagram.com/laurahigh5/reel/DExTnRRgodI/

You do not have to like the app, that is perfectly fine. TT has a lot of problems, anyone who’s on there is completely aware of that. But this ban sets a terrifying precedence for us as a nation. Governments that ban websites are not part of a group we want to belong to.

If this was purely about privacy and data concerns, then all platforms would be getting highlighted right now and not just TT getting singled out. We know that meta, Google, X, sells our data, this is common knowledge.

TT has provided an income or supplemental income to literally millions of Americans. It has provided billions in revenue for our country. It has provided incredible advertising for countless small businesses. Banning will be impacting millions economically.

If you’re gonna tell me about the spread of misinformation on TT, sure there’s plenty of that there. There’s also plenty of that on literally every single social media platform. That has been a problem with social media since before TT existed. If that genuinely was the problem that the government was concerned about then all social media platforms would be getting highlighted.

Laura referenziert das Willow Project, das durch auf Tiktok organisertes Engagement beinahe verhindert worden ist – seit dem gibt es laut ihr die Bestrebungen in den USA, Tiktok zu verbieten.

Aber sie schließt dann auch mit "They voted to take away billions of revenue from the citizens of this country.They voted go get rid of millions of jobs. This is a direct attack on free speech. And honestly they're deleting culture."

Es geht um Free Speech, aber es geht auch um Einkommen.

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from isotopp@infosec.exchange

Toot

Written by Kris on 2025-01-17 at 13:41

Und das ist ein wichtiger Punkt.

In https://infosec.exchange/@Crispius/113843828455007938 heißt es:

Fascism begins the moment a ruling class, fearing the people may use their political democracy to gain economic democracy, begins to destroy political democracy in order to retain its power of exploitation and special privilege."

 - Tommy Douglas

Auch in Hinsicht auf https://loops.video.

Diese Leute verdienen Geld mit Tiktok, Insta und Youtube Shorts – progressiv weniger in dieser Reihenfolge. Sie machen interessnate Inhalte und haben Spaß, aber vor allen Dingen machen sie das beruflich. Sie monetarisieren ihre Videos.

Eine App, gleich welcher Art, zentralisiert oder dezentral ist dabei vollkommen egal, kann nur dann Inhalte bekommen und professionell produzierte Inhalte und die damit einher gehende Dynamik, wenn die Plattform keine Berührungsängste mit Geld hat.

Dann kommt Fedi.

Ja, äh, ok, dann halt kein Fedi.

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from isotopp@infosec.exchange

Descendants

Written by lobingera on 2025-01-17 at 13:52

@isotopp Ich stehe auf dem Schlauch. Fedi (also Social Media auf Basis eines gemeinsamen Protokolls) schließt weder Algorithmus noch Geldverdienen aus.

Wir kennen nur noch kein Beispiel.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lobingera@chaos.social