I'm temperamentally not a predicty person, but it looks to me like the coming wave of LLM-centric solutions to new-school platform governance is going to get a whole lot of resources and attention because it's the saving throw/deus ex machina for redeeming the combination of global scale + hyper-acceleration + a generally neoliberal-to-libertarian sense of what's good. I hope some boring-to-capital, sensible, and human-centric things break through.
I think that's all I will say about that.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kissane@mas.to
Oops sorry not done, I think the other, quieter reason LLMs-as-AI are going to get shoehorned into everything governance is that they allow technologists to keep focusing on things that sound neutral or blandly prosocial rather than “political” and not being overtly political is a comically huge part of being perceived by powerful people as a legitimate and reasonable force. Just another structural reality.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kissane@mas.to
omg why did no one tell me about the “deux” typo in the top post why, whyyy
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kissane@mas.to
@kissane Evolving netiquette. Typo corrections and other #RandomPedantry are borderline reply-guy behavior, and many people are trying to discourage it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from grumpybozo@toad.social
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).