How does a query to GPT-4 compare to driving a car?
A single query to GPT-4 with a 10,000-word answer size produces 450 gCO2e (*). An average UK car produces 132 gCO2e/km. So this query is equivalent to driving a car 3.4 km.
[#]FrugalComputing
(*) https://wimvanderbauwhede.codeberg.page/articles/google-search-vs-chatgpt-emissions/ and assuming 100 words for the queries in that article; in reality it is probably closer to 30 words, but I prefer to be conservative.
Car stats from https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/average-co2-emissions-car-uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e
Large language models are not knowledge agregators and shouldn’t be used for searching.
It’s just outside their functional capabilities.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from justanotheramy@aus.social
@justanotheramy I agree, and I don't think anyone really wants those AI summaries. But nevertheless we get them.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e
People are using them, and that’s a user education problem.
There’s a lot of black and white thinking around this tech: hype cycle boosting, or burn it all down.
Which leaves user education nowhere.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from justanotheramy@aus.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini