Stephen Fry "both siding" #trans rights while his friend who-will-not-be-named is both attacking trans rights and suing+attacking women to supposedly protect women's rights is very telling about what power does to your perspective.
Puberty blockers are banned in the UK for gender dysphoria, but not for cis kids needing to delay puberty. The government is not attacking Terfs. But it is doubling down on banning essential healthcare for trans people. The two sides are not equatable.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kavana@scholar.social
@kavana@scholar.social
It's very shitty, but most cis kids using puberty blockers are not TERFs they're just kids! Attacking them with labels isn't helping the trans kids! Your just repeating the cycle of abuse!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from AWolfInCheapClothing@calckey.world
@AWolfInCheapClothing
Uhhh I'm not attacking cis kids. Nor am I calling them Terfs.
I'm highlighting that the government is attacking trans kids by blocking health care that's otherwise available to cis kids. And also pointing out that there is no attack on Terfs, which is the both sides for Fry.
My instance doesn't allow more than 500 characters, so I try to make it as short as possible because I don't generally like doing threads.
Sorry if it wasn't clear.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kavana@scholar.social This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini