Ancestors

Toot

Written by cpu on 2024-12-16 at 15:24

me: -Wall

compiler: you got it chief

me: is that all of your warnings?

compiler: lol no, I'm saving 86 more!

me: -Wall -Wextra ?

compiler: still no. all and extra leaves out 70 more aren't I coy?

me: -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic ?

compiler: stillllll holding back 66 :3

me: -Wall-no-really-this-is-like-juggling-chainsaws-and-I-want-you-to-yell-at-me-for-absolutely-everthing

compiler: unrecognized command-line option

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cpu@hachyderm.io

Descendants

Written by Tony Finch on 2024-12-16 at 21:16

@cpu

me: -Weverything

clang: ooh ooh i’ve got like half a dozen mutually contradictory warnings, this’ll be fun! by the way, did you know the standard header locations are scary?!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fanf@mendeddrum.org

Written by cpu on 2024-12-16 at 21:16

@fanf 😭

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cpu@hachyderm.io

Written by Félix on 2024-12-16 at 21:34

@fanf @cpu -Weverything is the technically correct answer. It is also documented to be undesirable most of the time: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#enabling-all-diagnostics

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fay59@tech.lgbt

Written by cpu on 2024-12-16 at 21:38

@fay59 @fanf technically correct unless you're stuck with gcc no?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cpu@hachyderm.io

Written by Félix on 2024-12-16 at 21:49

@cpu @fanf yes, I only meant to address that Clang’s -Weverything is good to discover diagnostics, not good to use in production. GCC doesn’t have an equivalent, AFAIK (but if it did, the same caveat would apply)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from fay59@tech.lgbt