Does anyone have a link to that code quality #ai study? Someone is asking me for a link.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alter_kaker@hachyderm.io
@alter_kaker
The 30% more bugs study? In that case there is no actual real study, just a report without details by a company. You need to put in your email address to download it so they can sell their engineering metrics product to you.
https://resources.uplevelteam.com/gen-ai-for-coding
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from faassen@fosstodon.org
@faassen
Thank you
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alter_kaker@hachyderm.io
@alter_kaker
I have grumbled about this "study" in the past so I remember it. :)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from faassen@fosstodon.org
@faassen
I appreciate the grumble, it might save me some trouble later on. So you saw the report?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alter_kaker@hachyderm.io
@alter_kaker
Yeah I saw a copy, it was just a couple of pages without methods described. I think they used the dev metrics tools ("amount of PRs closed" etc) they want to sell and this was basically an ad.
If you're looking for academic research this is not it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from faassen@fosstodon.org
@faassen
I'm not necessarily looking for academic research, but I am looking for some dependable information if any such exists
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alter_kaker@hachyderm.io
@alter_kaker
I suspect we won't have clarity for a while on this matter.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from faassen@fosstodon.org This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini