The next time someone suggests again that tools & editors should just auto-adjust their UI based on usage, I'll show them this video.
The core message nails it at the end: "It made the screenshots look nicer."
I don't care if the UI look good in a design review. I care whether the user likes it!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RYStorm@mastodon.gamedev.place
I loved this so much about
@jordandevries.com
's GDC talk on the UI for customising a billion lightsabers: https://gdcvault.com/play/1034223/Customizing-a-Billion-Lightsabers-STAR
They bring up so many examples where they went "I don't know, this kinda sucks" in a design review, but during testing users were like "Hey wow this is great!"
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RYStorm@mastodon.gamedev.place
So the next time you think you've had awesome design reviews, but the product ended up sucking for the user, maybe think about testing it a little bit more instead of thinking you're Socrates, Plato, or Aristotle during a design review. The philosophy doesn't matter if the end result is not up to par
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RYStorm@mastodon.gamedev.place
@RYStorm analogous to a player control-animation dialectic in design: is this making the game look cooler to people who aren't playing it at the expense of the person who is, or is it making the game look & feel cooler to the person who's playing it?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jplebreton@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini