Apple claims that it forces Webkit to protect user's battery life. Turns out chrome/chromium has a better battery life.
Apple has a long list of excuses as to why it has to push the web out from mobile.
👉 https://birchtree.me/blog/everyone-says-chrome-devastates-mac-battery-life-but-does-it-i-tested-for-36-hours-to-find-out/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from owa@mastodon.social
@owa These browsers tests claim that #Safari is the most energy-efficient: https://medium.com/homullus/8-browsers-in-a-tiny-car-energy-efficiency-benchmark-fe3ca82f1690 and https://themainframe.ca/comparing-firefox-chrome-and-safari-battery-life/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from niutech@fosstodon.org
@niutech This may have been true a year ago, but the reality is it doesn’t actually matter, since energy efficiency can be a point of competition between browsers. The real issue is Apple likes to give a laundry list of excuses to regulators of why they have to exclude third party browsers on iOS including battery life.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from owa@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini