Coming back to this and thinking about visualisations again after some time working on another project. There's so much information here :)
[#]academicChatter #rStats
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from emma_cogdev@fediscience.org
Progress! Here's pooled mousetracking from multiple participants, with the density of the mousetracking points over x and y in light grey, and the density of a reference distribution in yellow.
[#]academicChatter #rStats
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from emma_cogdev@fediscience.org
@emma_cogdev what's the study?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ergative@wandering.shop
@ergative
So briefly:
We tell participants to search for targets with their mouse, and we have different rules governing where those targets are.
Then we can see where they search and infer whether they're learning the rules governing where the targets are.
And the overarching question is whether some rules are more intuitive than others, because there's this idea that people automatically assume one specific default rule, and maybe can't even learn any other rules than that default one.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from emma_cogdev@fediscience.org
@ergative
Does that sort of make sense? Happy to chat more about it!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from emma_cogdev@fediscience.org This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini