[#]sidays #Tubingen
We discussed colors and color use in data Visualizations - is blue π΅ more or less than red π?
Who of my bubble is here? #kaynieselt and I will catch up later for a biovisevening.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from helenajambor@mastodon.social
@helenajambor
Uh, let me know if you find an authoritative answer to that one. Itβs oddly context-dependent, no? Temperature: red=high, gene expression: red=low?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from leonardblaschek@fediscience.org
@leonardblaschek absolutely! We had as many interpretations as participants. Conclusion: colors need to be explicitly explained as not "inherently" clear.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from helenajambor@mastodon.social
@helenajambor @leonardblaschek And even the context is context dependent β for astronomical temperatures, red = cool (relatively, of course) and blue = hot β¦ so π― on the "explicitly explained" approach
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Biff_Bruise@vis.social
@Biff_Bruise @leonardblaschek I did not know that!! Cool, will expand my regular lectures with that info!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from helenajambor@mastodon.social
@helenajambor In that context, blue (ice) feels a lot cooler than red (fire). So I think it's a good choice.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from herrsaalfeld@mastodon.social
@helenajambor As a general rule I don't consider colours to have inherent ordinal hierarchy. But some colours in some contexts have semantic meaning (which can be ordinal and hierarchical). Like temperature in your example.
tl;dr don't think of colours as having numerical meaning, but consider their semantic meaning (given context).
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from simon@bne.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini