The Copyright Officer's response in denying our requested expanded 1201 DMCA exemption for non-game software is giving me flashbacks about a former boss (a very long time ago, this is not a subtoot) who would constantly ask for more details in proposals I was making to justify the use case, then wouldn't read said details because they were too technical
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from The_BFOOL@digipres.club
@The_BFOOL 😞
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from anj@digipres.club
@The_BFOOL I hate the ones who say no without actually saying no.
Just fucking say no, dammit.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dsalo@digipres.club
@dsalo right, so, extra cool to have one of those be the Register of Copyrights, lol
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from The_BFOOL@digipres.club
@The_BFOOL yeah srsly
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dsalo@digipres.club
@The_BFOOL having "too technical" flashbacks!!!!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ashley@digipres.club
@The_BFOOL Same for the Second Circuit on the #InternetArchive. "Your piles of evidence are insufficient to disprove my uncorroborated unfalsifiable dogmas. You'll need to provide more evidence next time, meanwhile I'll side with the opinion which came with zero evidence in support."
https://mamot.fr/@nemobis/113349707804088184
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini