Ancestors

Written by The Stallman report on 2024-10-14 at 12:06

We, the anonymous editors of the Stallman report, have published our investigation of Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation today to a general audience:

https://stallman-report.org

Our report exhaustively catalogues, analyzes, and offers a rebuttal of Richard Stallman's political program of sexual violence, catalogues credible allegations of misconduct, and documents the misconduct of the #FSF circa 2019 and 2021. Please read and share our work.

Boosts encouraged.

[#]freesoftware

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from report_press@mastodon.social

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 12:30

@report_press@mastodon.social It's been nearly 4 years since the open letter failed to achieve anything.

Get over it, bruh.

​:gnujihad:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 12:53

@report_press@mastodon.social Can I also just say that personally attacking people through an anonymous report is also a very lame thing to do?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by The Original Stripey Goodness on 2024-10-14 at 12:56

@SuperDicq @report_press defending a known sex pest though, that's supa-coo 🙄

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stripey@meow.social

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 13:04

@stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social "known sex pest"

Having some controversial political opinions and that one Betsy story from 45 years ago are pretty far from being a sex pest.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dave Wilburn :donor: on 2024-10-14 at 13:45

@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

What controversial political opinions are you referring to?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 13:50

@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social The same old quotes about things that are generally considered socially unacceptable to merely disagree on with the rest of society like age of consent and pornography.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dave Wilburn :donor: on 2024-10-14 at 13:53

@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

I see, so you think that the question of whether grownups should be able to have sex with children is just something that we might respectfully "merely disagree" on?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 14:06

@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social No, that's not what I'm saying at all.

A lot of people (including you apparently) are literally incapable of having a civil political discussion around the laws that govern sex without immediately painting the other side of the argument as disgusting pedophiles or something. There is a huge taboo around even discussing these things!

Like for example what should be proper age of consent? Should it be 16, 17, 18, or maybe even 21? If your answer differs only slightly from the norm in your region of the world you will be called a pedophile guaranteed.

Same when it comes to the banning of pornography that includes animals for example. We should be able to have a civil discussion if the criminalization of possession of these types of pornography can be considered censorship while keeping subjective morals of doing so in the first place about this out of the discussion.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dushman on 2024-10-14 at 18:24

@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social

I mean it was worse than that. rms literally said "voluntary" pedophilia is fine, it wasn't even about aoc. Afaik he retracted that statement but still very weird to say something like that in the first place. Pretty sure he never did anything of that nature to anyone tho.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 18:27

@dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social Yes, he retracted that statement a long time ago at this point, so I don't think it is a valid reason to remove him from the FSF.

I am indeed also very certain that he has not and does not want to abuse children.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dushman on 2024-10-14 at 18:30

@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social

Boils down to him saying weird shit on those subjects over the years. Wouldn't say he's a horrible person though. I'm not even a big fan of GNU/FSF.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest

Written by mangeurdenuage :gnu: :trisquel: :gondola_head: 🌿 :abeshinzo: :ignutius: :descartes: :stargate: on 2024-10-14 at 18:32

@dushman @SuperDicq @DaveMWilburn @report_press

I'm not even a big fan of GNU/FSF.

You wouldn't even be there if it weren't for those projects. Even the internet as a whole wouldn't be there. We'd probably be stuck in AOLs sandbox ecosystem.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world

Written by Dushman on 2024-10-14 at 18:34

@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @report_press@mastodon.social

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest

Written by mangeurdenuage :gnu: :trisquel: :gondola_head: 🌿 :abeshinzo: :ignutius: :descartes: :stargate: on 2024-10-14 at 18:37

@dushman @SuperDicq @DaveMWilburn @report_press

that's giving them too much credit.

The GPL influenced so many things, you can historically look at all public stuff we have today and most of them always have "I was inspired by the GPL/RMS"

Wikipedia, redit (the old), the www, EFF etc... all of that started because of that single domino effect.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world

Written by Dushman on 2024-10-14 at 18:42

@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social

I mean the BSD licenses were made basically at the same time. They weren't the only ones with that kinda idea.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest

Written by Dushman on 2024-10-14 at 18:43

@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social

Both are from 89 iirc

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest

Toot

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 18:50

@dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest @mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social The idea of the 4-clause BSD license was never anything similar to the concept of free software, they just did it for practicality and research reasons at the time.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Descendants