We, the anonymous editors of the Stallman report, have published our investigation of Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation today to a general audience:
https://stallman-report.org
Our report exhaustively catalogues, analyzes, and offers a rebuttal of Richard Stallman's political program of sexual violence, catalogues credible allegations of misconduct, and documents the misconduct of the #FSF circa 2019 and 2021. Please read and share our work.
Boosts encouraged.
[#]freesoftware
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from report_press@mastodon.social
@report_press@mastodon.social It's been nearly 4 years since the open letter failed to achieve anything.
Get over it, bruh.
:gnujihad:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@report_press@mastodon.social Can I also just say that personally attacking people through an anonymous report is also a very lame thing to do?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq @report_press defending a known sex pest though, that's supa-coo 🙄
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stripey@meow.social
@stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social "known sex pest"
Having some controversial political opinions and that one Betsy story from 45 years ago are pretty far from being a sex pest.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press
What controversial political opinions are you referring to?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange
@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social The same old quotes about things that are generally considered socially unacceptable to merely disagree on with the rest of society like age of consent and pornography.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press
I see, so you think that the question of whether grownups should be able to have sex with children is just something that we might respectfully "merely disagree" on?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange
@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social No, that's not what I'm saying at all.
A lot of people (including you apparently) are literally incapable of having a civil political discussion around the laws that govern sex without immediately painting the other side of the argument as disgusting pedophiles or something. There is a huge taboo around even discussing these things!
Like for example what should be proper age of consent? Should it be 16, 17, 18, or maybe even 21? If your answer differs only slightly from the norm in your region of the world you will be called a pedophile guaranteed.
Same when it comes to the banning of pornography that includes animals for example. We should be able to have a civil discussion if the criminalization of possession of these types of pornography can be considered censorship while keeping subjective morals of doing so in the first place about this out of the discussion.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social
I mean it was worse than that. rms literally said "voluntary" pedophilia is fine, it wasn't even about aoc. Afaik he retracted that statement but still very weird to say something like that in the first place. Pretty sure he never did anything of that nature to anyone tho.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest
@dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social Yes, he retracted that statement a long time ago at this point, so I don't think it is a valid reason to remove him from the FSF.
I am indeed also very certain that he has not and does not want to abuse children.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social
Boils down to him saying weird shit on those subjects over the years. Wouldn't say he's a horrible person though. I'm not even a big fan of GNU/FSF.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest
@dushman @SuperDicq @DaveMWilburn @report_press
I'm not even a big fan of GNU/FSF.
You wouldn't even be there if it weren't for those projects. Even the internet as a whole wouldn't be there. We'd probably be stuck in AOLs sandbox ecosystem.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @report_press@mastodon.social
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest
@dushman @SuperDicq @DaveMWilburn @report_press
that's giving them too much credit.
The GPL influenced so many things, you can historically look at all public stuff we have today and most of them always have "I was inspired by the GPL/RMS"
Wikipedia, redit (the old), the www, EFF etc... all of that started because of that single domino effect.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @report_press@mastodon.social I agree. Even something as critical to us our today culture such as Creative Commons and Wikipedia and everything similar would not exists if the GNU project hadn't popularized the concept of Copyleft.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo
@SuperDicq
@DaveMWilburn @mangeurdenuage @dushman @report_press
I wish Wikipedia stopped being so pathetic about ebegging, a lot of parasites that do nothing beyond leeching off funding should get the boot off Wikipedia and be forced to beg on the streets if that's all they're good for, and Wikipedia should do something to fight censorship rather than hopping the fed wagon if they care so much about copyleft.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from sally@freesoftwareextremist.com
@sally @dushman @DaveMWilburn @report_press @SuperDicq
https://youtube.com/watch?v=4AxtypXLSl0
Wikipedia is a success technically but the failure/degradation of society/civilization makes articles only as good as the people are.
These issues can't be solved by wikipedia but only by people who are willing to work around them. Not necessarily by wanting to replace wikipedia but for example hosting a browser plugin that would show another page of it less censored or influenced by govs or lobbies.
Again this is a short term solution for long term see cnvc.org
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world
@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social
I mean the BSD licenses were made basically at the same time. They weren't the only ones with that kinda idea.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest
@mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social
Both are from 89 iirc
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest
@dushman@hollow.raccoon.quest @mangeurdenuage@shitposter.world @dave@gleasonator.com @report_press@mastodon.social The idea of the 4-clause BSD license was never anything similar to the concept of free software, they just did it for practicality and research reasons at the time.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini