Does anyone maintain a blocklist of websites with (obviously completely incorrect) LLM garbage posing as tech articles? These finally infiltrated top search results of my queries… I wonder if there's an automated way to filter it out?
Case in point: searching for difference between declarative, active, and passive Wasm element segments in DuckDuckGo. One of the results is nonsense about elements influencing how HTML is rendered :psyduck:
Apparently only remaining legit source is Wasm spec now
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from maxd@mastodon.social
@maxd It was cool when human knowledge was accessible to everyone wasn’t it?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mattiem@mastodon.social
@mattiem @maxd it never was.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nanoelquant@c.im
@nanoelquant @mattiem yeah, somehow it's "free to use easily accessible training data" for LLMs, but "piracy" for everyone else
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from maxd@mastodon.social
@maxd @nanoelquant Perhaps this was commentary on access to technology and language barriers?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mattiem@mastodon.social
@maxd *for now 😂
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alexito4@mastodon.social
@maxd I don’t but this sounds like something I’d contribute to if it was a repository or the like.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from redalemeden@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini