(another) NEW PREPRINT! We document how the media have reduced their use of preprints post-pandemic.
Proportion of stories with preprints now BELOW where we predict based on pre-pandemic trends.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08473
[#]journalism #preprints #scicomm #scholcommlab
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from juancommander@mastodon.social
@juancommander was this paper posted after peer-review, out of interest? The PDF says 'accepted at Science communication'. I've emailed you some thoughts about it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from richvn@mastodon.social
@richvn it was accepted as a commentary (not reviewed). It's an extension of this other work, which was peer reviewed, and in which we do an analysis by outlet type: https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/5/2/297/118871/Unreviewed-science-in-the-news-The-evolution-of
Got your email and will respond with some thoughts soon.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from juancommander@mastodon.social This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini