I did not catch this π
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JetForMe@geekstodon.com
@JetForMe what? OMG π± I totally missed this
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from webhat@infosec.exchange
@JetForMe wait. accepting cookies was not a thing in 2000
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from krzyzanowskim@mastodon.social
@krzyzanowskim it was between programs
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JetForMe@geekstodon.com
@krzyzanowskim @JetForMe I think it was. We still called them "magic cookies" back then. They just weren't ubiquitous like now.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rogermexico@mas.to
@krzyzanowskim @JetForMe https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2109 '97 RFC
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from AKPAB@mastodon.social
@krzyzanowskim @JetForMe it was
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mykhaylo@fosstodon.org
@JetForMe were cookie accept dialogs even a thing in the 90s?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from cinebox@hackers.town
@cinebox No, but the cookies themselves were.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JetForMe@geekstodon.com
@JetForMe @cinebox not ones implemented in javascript on web pages, but browsers back then could absolutely be configured to ask the user if they wanted to accept a cookie
(there were rather fewer cookies back then so this was sorta feasible)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from joeyh@hachyderm.io
@cinebox @JetForMe Cookie accept dialogs weren't a thing, but cookies were!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alcinnz@floss.social
@JetForMe In "The Matrix runs on Windows XP" she literally says "I hope you have cookies enabled" π€£
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from yuki2501@hackers.town
@JetForMe Usually, the Oracle demands huge license fees in order to use its database.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from log@mastodon.sdf.org
@JetForMe I'm pretty sure she put something in that cookie too. She tells him to eat it and that he'll feel better about things soon and he does, almost immediately, which suggests it probably isn't just a weed cookie. My guess is that it was some kind of bootstrap code that triggered when he died, possibly with whatever cryptographic keys would be needed to turn him into The One. Also probably some weed.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from StarkRG@myside-yourside.net
@JetForMe I am going to have to watch it again
Was the cookie first or last?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jfparis@rouge.eu.org
@jfparis Toward the end, I think.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JetForMe@geekstodon.com
@JetForMe
I thought so and I want to check
It loses a bit of the symbolism if that is the case
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jfparis@rouge.eu.org
@jfparis Indeed. Then again, the writers probably didnβt understand the technicalities (or chose not to respect them), as is typical in sci-fi writing, and wrote the scene in a way they felt was most natural.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JetForMe@geekstodon.com
@JetForMe@geekstodon.com fuck same
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Stellar@mk.absturztau.be
@JetForMe
That's too early for such a problem. But still funny.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from skobkin@lor.sh This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini