Ancestors

Toot

Written by Romain Francoise on 2024-05-20 at 17:35

the kind of post that makes me a lot less likely to try bcachefs…

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2uuhtn5rnrfqvwx7krec6lc57gptqearrwwbtbpedvlbor7ziw@zgbzssfacdbe/

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rfr@tilde.zone

Descendants

Written by nytpu on 2024-05-20 at 17:44

@rfr “So you didn't answer whether you ran checkpatch and ignored the warning (in which case a commit comment explaining why would have been useful) or didn't run checkpatch”

uHm Real Programmers don't need to document why they flagrantly ignore warnings about bad practices

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nytpu@tilde.zone

Written by Romain Francoise on 2024-05-20 at 18:02

@nytpu why bother when all the code is basically perfect from the get-go thanks to supernatural intelligence? right?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rfr@tilde.zone

Written by Tris on 2024-05-20 at 17:59

@rfr I assume you might have already seen this one: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whDuqyVC6xMkOnNt2EeTd-s4uqa3sYghj5UzkELFW2bpw@mail.gmail.com/ xD

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from triskelion@floss.social

Written by Romain Francoise on 2024-05-20 at 18:02

@triskelion it did raise my eyebrows at the time, yes…

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rfr@tilde.zone

Written by Karl on 2024-05-20 at 21:09

@rfr Setting aside the very haughty and elitist discourse which in itself leaves a quite poor impression (replying to Kees… not someone I'd talk down to), I would not want to rely on a fs almost exclusively developed by somebody so averse to having their work reviewed. For more than one reasons.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from karl@infosec.exchange