Here's my problem with #ArchLinux: it seems to greatly prioritize "feeling super cool h4x0rm4n" over actually being useful.
Take package updates for example. If it's been a while, it will almost certainly tell you for every package you're trying to update:
[Package file] is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Oh shit! Corrupted file! MITM! Hax!
Lol no. Nowhere, anywhere, does it tell you what the actual (trivial) problem is, or how to fix it.
[#]flamebait but true :P
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ojensen@hachyderm.io
Here is a useful error message:
The signing keys have expired. You can update them via
sudo pacman -S archlinux-keyring
sudo pacman-key --refresh-keys
Or, better yet, don't have an error at all and just do this automatically.
But if it did that, you wouldn't be able to feel super cool key-jockeying your crypto shit, and if you don't intrinsically know this then maybe you're just too dumb to Arch.
This attitude seems to be pervasive across the entire operating system.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ojensen@hachyderm.io
I may be irritated at my computer today.
Then again I'm irritated by almost every computer almost every day, so 🤷
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ojensen@hachyderm.io
@ojensen Agree with your assessment of Archlinux. They make me feel too dumb to Arch, and it's just silly gate-keeping!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wx1g@queer.cool This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini