Epoxy jar and hooks, freshly demolded.
The hands are painful this morning, so pleaseβ
[#]alt4me
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
The same is true for all the confirming experiments since. The entire experimental field is achieving inequalities violations by ... experimenter bias!
As for the third winner, Zeilinger, his work depends on the veracity of the foregoing, and so is fallacious.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Then it was co-awarded to Alain Aspect. Aspect's famous paper is written carefully, for instance referring to light pulses instead of presuming a particular form for the light. However, there is a very, very serious difficulty.
In a well run experiment, it should be impossible to violate CHSH inequalities. This is true due to CHSH inequalities being erroneously derived. It has nothing to do with physics as such.
Yet Aspect achieves violations. Therefore his experimental technique was bad.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Here is what I think about the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics.
First, it was really meant for John Stewart Bell, but he passed away long ago. However, what Bell was to be given it for brazenly botching Bayes' rule. In any other field he would have been laughed out of the room.
John Clauser won it instead. Clauser obfuscates the errors but also does the mathematics incorrectly. One clue is the banter about people playing games instead of straightforward description of the experiment.
[#]physics
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
And I don't know this, but surely "survival of the fittest" originally referred not to survival of "fittest individuals" but to fittest traits. Because otherwise it is a stupid thing to say. Now, I can certainly believe Darwin or others had stupid things to say, but "survival of fittest traits" has the virtue of NOT being stupid. It is a corollary of natural selection.
("Survival of fittest traits" is what inspires eugenics. But eugenicists tend to be pretty stupid, no?)
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
But, suppose we had no MMR. In the past it was probably most often those who were well cared for who most often survived. Not those who had "strong immune systems" or were "the fittest", but who were kept clean and fed and watered, and were kept from scratching by having their nails cut down, and were wrapped in wet towels to lower their temperatures.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
It is really difficult to get people not to reformulate something I am explaining. They want to make it fit what they already "know". No, no, no!
So, for instance, if I say humans have immune systems not so they can survive measles individual, but so SOME of them can survive measles, I AM NOT saying that those with the "strongest immune systems" or that "the fittest" will survive. I am saying nothing more and nothing less than what I said!
It will turn out those who got MMR survived!
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
If they doubt it, they can run a computer program as an experiment. It will confirm the result. But physicists also no longer run simple experiments before inventing bold (and in this case false) hypotheses such as "non-locality".
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
One of the HUGE problems preventing us from having an active fundamental physics is that physicists simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND the followingβ
ONCE A PHYSICS PROBLEM IS STATED AS A WORD PROBLEM, IT IS NO LONGER PHYSICS, BUT MATHEMATICS.
This confusion is apparent in failure to solve the two channel optical Bell test without quantum mechanics. It is a simple problem, but physicists do not see they can do an angular transformation without actually rotating the apparatus.
[#]physics #mathematics
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Another "statement of concern" in "Science" about a biomed paper. This about some graphs perhaps being faked?
I want to know when physics papers are going to start to see this.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
What if Richard Feynman had been a real physicist instead of a "quantum" physicist? Think of what we have lost.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
This is merely the observation that banks in the U.S. are still using punched cards and IBM mechanical collation machines, due to American management being Harvard graduates. It is not evidence of a conspiracy to enrich anyone.
It doesn't even make a lick of sense that this would be a system purposely designed to enrich anyone. Why would American Megabank purposely be inefficient so some third party could make money?
(I know you can give a "reason". Do it elsewhere.)
https://mastodon.social/@tess/113906045112042127
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Also, one may wonder why NOT rotating the angles and then attempting to solve "classically" results in incorrect "inequalities".
One answer is that insufficient care has been taken to rule out that the solution doesn't apply to an entirely different experiment. It will turn out the calculations are for partially obstructed particle beams.
Though really what has happened is that John Clauser was abysmal at mathematics, as was John Bell.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
I thought maybe I should add late that physicists may complain rotating the problem to the case where one of the settings is zero is illegitimate, because you have not actually rotated the physical apparatus.
But we are solving a mathematical problem. We are not running an experiment. Once we wrote the problem down as a WORD PROBLEM it was no longer a physical experiment, but mathematics.
In any case, write a computer simulation. I have written many. They confirm the result. Bell was WRONG.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
LOL. It has found evidence of a lake. But, given Mars had rivers, no one could have doubted Mars had lakes.
Lakes are not actually evidence of life. Their absence is evidence against life. It is not the same thing.
Chron: Life on Mars? NASA rover finds breakthrough supporting the case. https://www.chron.com/news/space/article/mars-nasa-curiosity-rover-life-20055602.php
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
What ACTUALLY happened is Twitter went out of business. They sold the remains to Musk, who has tried to turn it into his long dreamed of "X". It really is not Twitter, no matter how much we pretend it still is. Twitter went out of business. But Musk is a goofball and "X" is the equivalent of a schoolboy's hand-drawn flying supercar.
Futurism: In Leaked Email, Elon Musk Admits Defeat on Twitter https://futurism.com/the-byte/leaked-email-elon-musk-defeat-twitter
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
The Nobel goes on to award Anton Zeilinger, presumably mostly for "quantum" computing, but the "quantum" analysis of "quantum" computing depends on there being no "classical" solution to the two channel optical Bell test. Above we derived such a solution. Therefore "quantum" computing analysis is wrong.
A "quantum" computer is actually a very expensive and unreliable hybrid analog-digital computer.
[#]QuantumComputing
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Just a quick reminder why the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded in error. John Clauser's papers should in fact be retracted for mathematical errors.
The "quantum" correlation of the two channel optical Bell test is -cos 2(a-b). Rewrite that as -cos 2((a'+c)-(b'+c)), where a'+c=a, b'+c=b. If we choose b'=0 then the correlation has the form -cos 2a', WHICH IS WIDELY KNOWN TO BE THE "CLASSICAL" SOLUTION.
ONE MERELY ROTATES THE ANGLES SIMULTANEOUSLY.
[#]quantumPhysics #physics #mathematics
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
But if the temperature gets really high, due to a very virulent illness, we are getting into the territory of the system breaking down. This is your child in the process of dying, or making it through, but perhaps with brain damage.
Always remember: NATURE IS PERFECTLY HAPPY IF YOUR CHILD DIES.
If it is happy killing robin fledglings, it is just as happy killing human kiddies.
So use that acetaminophen/paracetamol. And use those antibiotics.β«οΈ
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
Well, I think it IS true that you should let a LOW fever alone. My understanding is that a fever is a sort of jury rigged method by which the body activates certain immune mechanism. It is the high temperature that gets them going. If the temperature is not too high, no harm is done.
It is like if you were doing a strenuous activity.
=> More informations about this toot | View the thread
=> This profile with reblog | Go to chemoelectric@masto.ai account This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini
