Reply to
=> https://lobste.rs/s/c5gp8j/understanding_urbit#c_fizc6z
Original thread reply
So you must also be against ICANN and their limited TLD designations? And against Twitter/Facebook for limiting users (shadow banning)?
////
ICANN is insufficiently regulated and holds an artificial monopoly. There’s no technical limitation to prevent everyone on earth having their own TLD. So yes, I am against rent-seeking when it comes to TLDs.
Facebook and Twitter identities are not artificially limited de facto - the services are awash in bots.
And in any case, I stated the following:
[…] I don’t have a problem with this concept intellectually. People have different ideals and projects for the future of digital governance.
I just wish that people pushing Urbit would be honest about the project’s ultimate goals.
────────────────────────────────────────────
=> ✽ Sunday, 2019-10-20 | → more posts in the ‹lobsters-drafts› category
About this category: “Sometimes I post to lobste.rs, sometimes I write angry rants that end up here but not there”
Copyright © 2018 - 2022 Gustaf Erikson
[This Page Viewed Best In Any Gemini Client]
text/gemini; lang=en
This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).