Pentax ME Super review


Last month (really??? it feels like longer

ago) I wrote[1] about my positive experience

with an Asahi Pentax Spotmatic that I bought

cheaply on a whim from a Stockholm

fleamarket, and outlined some vague future

plans for ending up with an advanced Canon

SLR and a very primitive Pentax.

Hahaha, plans.

As mentioned I did quite a bit of reading on

the history of Asahi/Pentax and have become

somethong of a fan - a "Pentaxian", as they

say. I've never really had anything against

Pentax, but aside from thinking that the

Spotmatic (along with Minolta's SRT line!)

was one of the prettiest classic SLRs, I've

also never really paid them much attention.

Back in New Zealand, the local Craigslist

equivalent was awash with cheap P30s, which

seemed widely regarded as a solid and

affordible beginner's camera, but I always

thought they were ugly (they are). So, I was

quite surprised to learn that they have more

than few impressive historical feathers in

their hat: Asahi made Japan's very first SLR,

at a time when Canon and Nikon were still

cloning German rangefinders; they made the

world's first SLR with an instant return

mirror; the Spotmatic was not quite the

world's first SLR with through-the-lens

metering, but it was the first which was made

and sold in large numbers; the Pentax ME-F

was the first 35mm SLR with autofocus (not

that I think much of autofocus at all, but I

recognise the engineering achievement). In

short they were a really innovative player in

the golden years, and made some really good

gear - gear which is now considerably cheaper

than stuff from the "bigger" brands.

One achievement of Pentax caught my eye in

particular, but I'll set the scene first.

As mentioned in my Yashica 35-ME review[2],

with my Canon AE-1 I had fallen into the

classic trap of buying a bunch of lenses

(instead of accepting that you're never

going to be able to take every possible photo

you might like to take no matter how many

lenses you have, so instead it's better to

stick to just one or maybe two and get really

good at using them) and then buying a

dedicated bag to lug all my stuff around in

(this bag[3], because I quite enjoyed reading

that website at the time). By the standards

of how far camera geeks can go this was still

a very small and light kit. But it was

enough of a kerfuffle that I eventually

stopped bringing it with me at all whenever I

travelled, even when doing things like

travelling up to Finnish Lapland in winter.

The hassle of taking that bag with me was

definitely contributing to my much decreased

rate of shooting in recent years.

The little Yashica was an attempt to remedy

this by getting a camera that I could

comfortable take everywhere. It didn't end

up being the camera for me, but I remained,

lazily, on the hunt for something smaller and

lighter than my Canon AE-1 with just the one

50mm lens on it, without compromising on

build quality, user experience or control. I

always kind of assumed that this would end up

coming in the form of an old rangefinder; a

Canon Canonet, or a Minolta Hi-Matic or a

Yashica Electro 35, or something along those

lines.

I was aware, of course, of Olympus' famous OM

line of super-compact SLRs from the 70s. But

I didn't think they would necessarily be

small enough, and I was already invested in a

set of Canon FD lenses. Besides, the OM

cameras are weird - shutter speed and

aperture control are both via rings on the

lens, with the top plate knob only

controlling the speed setting for the meter!

What I was not aware of was that a few

years after Olympus debuted the OM cameras,

Pentax, having figured this would definitely

be a bandwagon worth jumping on, released

their own line of compact SLRs, the M series,

which were actually even smaller and lighter

than the OM cameras. To date, these Pentax M

models are the smallest and lightest 35mm

SLRs anybody ever made. Despite this, they

have fully metal bodies and totally classic

aesthetics. They immediately caught my

interest.

As I wrote in my Spotmatic entry, I was

excited that the Spotty would give me a

chance to a try one of the legendary Super

Takumar lenses, with have a definite cult

following. My local camera store which sells

quite a lot of used stuff had a "vintage

weekend" sale a while back with 20% off all

analogue gear, so I went there to get a good

deal on a 55m f/1.8 Super Tak (I finished my

first roll shot with it yesterday and will be

dropping it off at the lab tomorrow.

Exciting!).

As it turned out they had some M series

cameras there, too - an ME with a 50mm f/1.7

lens on it, and an ME Super without a lens.

I took the lens cap off the ME and held it up

to my eye and knew, immediately, that I had

to get one of these cameras. The viewfinder

was bigger, brighter and clearer than

anything else I've ever seen. It was a

genuine revelation. I fired the shutter

once and everything felt and sounded

fantastic.

I gave in to a crazy impulse: I sold them

ME Super body and then bought a lens for it

off eBay. Now I'm an all-Pentax shooter! I

finished my first roll through the ME Super

yesterday as well. It's a really fantastic

camera and superior to my AE-1 in just about

every single way I can imagine.

Without any film but with batteries and a

lens on it, the ME Super clocks in at 600g,

which is about as much as either the

Spotmatic or AE-1 weigh with batteries and no

film or lens. So the whole kit is probably

a good 200g lighter, in the ballpark of a 25%

weight saving. This thing is actually

lighter than all those classic fixed-lens

rangefinders I mentioned earlier. More

importantly, it's also smaller than the AE-1.

If I'm wearing a jacket with large pockets,

I can slip it in without too much effort.

It's also small enough to easily fit in one

of the zippered pouches on my backpack. It's

certainly not in the same league as the

little Yashica, but it's a big step up in

portability, and I think it's portable

enough for me.

Compared to the Canon AE-1, the Pentax ME

Super:

magnification instead of 0.86x.

die, but can still be shot purely

mechanically at 1/125s

1/2000s.

semi-automatic exposure, which is much

more useful (for me) than the Canon's

shutter-priority semi-auto mode.

override mode.

from 2 stops under to 2 stops over,

compared to the Canon's 1.5 stop over

button, which is a bona fide ergonomic

nightmare to use.

Are there no negatives? Well:

incredibly user unfriendly (involving

turning a knob at the same time as pushing

in a tiny button on that same knob) that I

will not use it habitually.

under-built and I don't know how it would

stand up to heavy use over many years. I

do prefer Canon's system of having the

release button be part of the lens rather

than the camera body.

But I'm really struggling to think of

anything else. On the whole I think it would

be very hard to convincingly argue against

the Pentax being the superior camera.

Specs and feature list aside, I can't

emphasise enough how great the ME super feels

and sounds to use. The film advance lever

throw is relatively short, with a firm but

smooth feel that is consistent throughout the

entire travel. It feels better than the AE-1

or the Spotmatic and even though I've never

actually had the need to do so, it almost

as you can. The shutter is quiet and soft

but still gives you the clear impression that

a mechanical operation has happened

completely and correctly. It's just a

sensory joy to use.

The meter readout in the viewfinder is a

series of LEDs arranged vertically up the

left-hand side, with shutter speeds next to

each one. In aperture priority mode, when

you half-press the shutter, the selected

aperture lights up. Brilliantly, the meter

stays active after you take your finger off

the shutter for 25 seconds (or until you fire

the shutter), so you don't need to keep the

release carefully half-pressed with one hand

while adjusting the aperture with the other.

Some people would prefer the aesthetics of a

needle over the LEDs, and I definitely

understand that, but needle meters are hard

to read in low-light. The ME Super very

cleverly uses green LEDs next to shutter

speeds of 1/60s or faster and yellow LEDs

next to 1/30s or slower. So, with a 50mm

lens, you know immediately if your speed is

fast enough for hand-held shooting even if

it's dark or something black is in your

frame behind the numbers.

When shooting in manual mode, shutter speed

is adjusted not with the traditional knob

but by two small push buttons for increasing

or decreasing the speed by one stop. People

online love to hate these buttons. Again,

aesthetically speaking, I totally get this

and I would prefer a traditional knob. They

are the ME Super's biggest aesthetic failing

by far. They look like they belong on one of

the black/grey plastic highly automated SLRs

of the late 80s or 90s. I understand

people's concerns about their reliability,

too. If I was looking for a camera to shoot

in manual mode all the time, I probably

wouldn't enthusiastically recommend this

camera. But for me, that's what my Spotmatic

is for. I will use aperture priority mode

most of the time on this thing, using the

compensation knob to deal with backlit

subjects. Manual mode will only be used "in

emergencies" for very tricky metering

situations. Many people have written that

the buttons are too small to use comfortably,

but I actually find them very usable, and I

have big hands.

So, my new "big picture" plan is that the

ME Super with just a 50mm lens will be my

travel camera, small and light enough to

easily take anywhere with me without needing

a dedicated bag, and easy enough just grab

casually when popping outside if the mood

takes me. With semi-automatic exposure I can

rely on it to take good shots quickly when

something catches my eye. Meanwhile, the

Spotmatic will become my vehicle for slower,

more deliberate photography, in fully manual

mode. Being bigger and heavier I'll limit it

to photography closer to home. If I find

myself getting lens GAS, I'll direct it

toward relatively cheap and interesting m42

lenses for the Spotmatic, so that the ME

Super always remains a simple grab 'n go

system.

Well, hahaha, plans. More on that in a later

entry.

[1] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/asahi-pentax-spotmatic-sp-1000-review.txt

[2] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/photos-yashica-35-ME-review.txt

[3] https://lewiscollard.com/cameras/lowepro-nova-1-camera-bag/

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space/~solderpunk/phlog/pentax-me-super-review.txt
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/plain; charset=utf-8
Capsule Response Time
407.296632 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
2.840985 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).