I'd like to thank eaplmx and Stacksmith for their responses. They've given me food for thought 🙂
I do understand that some projects have to be big by nature: the first moon landing, the development of new microchips with ever smaller transistors, large infrastructure projects, etc.
To give some real world examples that I feel are only driven by ambition rather than usefulness:
For all of these I feel that they were "big enough" and had a steady income stream that provided plenty of economic sustenance for everybody within the company. Their expansion looks to be only driven by a want from management or founders to make further economic excess.
I guess it's greed, or an ambition to "be someone" or... something. I don't really understand it, even though I at one point had the same mindset. I wanted to build something big and be well known. It's just that I know feel that I've matured from that position and understand the pointlessness of the hours one has to put in just to reach a point where one has more money than one can reasonably spend on necessities. And the end result is a top heavy organisation with a very large percentage of non-profitable employees; people who are only there to control or take care of other people or money.
=> Stacksmith's reply post. | eaplmx's reply post.
-- CC0 ew0k, 2022-01-26
text/gemini; lang=en
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).