2023-06-26 05:56:33 I'm not aware of any channels about the analogue pocket; this channel is primarily for discussion of RetroForth.

2023-06-26 10:10:49 crc: which retroforth should i use? konilo?

2023-06-26 10:15:25 if you had to suggest one of the forths you've written so far

2023-06-26 10:15:31 which one?

2023-06-26 10:45:37 for most people, retroforth

2023-06-26 10:46:23 it fits better into modern systems; has better documentation; & more examples

2023-06-26 10:47:01 konilo is better if you want a little system that's self contained or are running on resource constrained systems

2023-06-26 10:49:05 my personal use is now mixed; I spend most of my time using konilo for writing & small programs, and use retroforth to do external tasks. E.g., I have a small wiki I write in konilo, but retro is used to generate the HTML files when I publish

2023-06-26 15:44:09 hmm, i cant seem to get retroforth to compile, it can't find strlcpy despite being able to previously compile it

2023-06-26 15:48:27 hmm, it seems that the commit that splits the makefile is at fault here

2023-06-26 16:02:24 ah i see the problem now

2023-06-26 16:03:14 gnumakefile does not load the header at all after it got split

2023-06-26 16:04:53 a severe lack of "ENABLED += -DNEEDS_STRL"

2023-06-26 16:05:24 crc: do you take patches?

2023-06-26 16:09:22 yes

2023-06-26 16:10:56 excellent

2023-06-26 16:11:19 where should i send these?

2023-06-26 16:11:23 and should i use fossil for that?

2023-06-26 16:12:36 fossil diff would create a patch, or you could manually diff.

2023-06-26 16:13:45 crc@forthworks.com

2023-06-26 16:14:33 ah, good.

2023-06-26 16:14:43 give me a moment to clean things up first

2023-06-26 16:16:09 never done fossil before

2023-06-26 16:21:21 fossil help diff

2023-06-26 16:39:51 crc: apologies for the delay

2023-06-26 16:39:52 i sent it

2023-06-26 16:45:13 Thanks; I'll merge it in tonight

2023-06-26 17:13:19 tyvm