Ancestors

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:51

Right. Ofcom's next online session is about "low risk" services.

I'll be tooting my thoughts in this thread.

Feel free to mute if you wish :)

[#]OnlineSafetyAct

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:54

"We haven't done a great deal of work about decentralised services in detail".

We can't give you a specific answer to who the provider might be.

(I fear "we can't help with that" will be a common theme.)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:56

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:57

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:58

Nope. Skipped over that.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 15:59

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:02

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:03

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:04

An excellent question from @cyberleagle, which Ofcom's webinar system has mangled badly:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:06

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:08

Ofcom is using an example of a "small gaming service" with "around 15,000 monthly UK users".

I wonder if Ofcom recognises that many of the people worrying about the OSA are talking about services with 0.1% of that userbase?!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:12

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:13

Even if low risk, you must have:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:17

I'll try to find some spare time to write some template "not legal advice" terms and conditions, and complaints-related information.

Although, honestly, goodness knows how that applies in the context of, say,

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:19

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:22

Questions!

"We probably can't give a definitive answer..."

What about services which are new, so have no evidence base?

Answer: you're right, we can't give a definitive answer...

sigh

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:24

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Written by Neil Brown on 2025-02-05 at 16:25

Oooh!

I think Ofcom has just said that single-user Mastodon instances are out of scope.

They read out my question, and said that.

But I fear that they have said that without knowing what the service is...

Even so, I'll be looking for that part of the recording :)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk

Toot

Written by galooph on 2025-02-05 at 16:46

@neil 'I have evidence you said it was ok' is quite a mitigation, I would say :-D

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from galooph@masto.galooph.com

Descendants

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113952446161830649
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
371.911444 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
3.78366 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).