Right. Ofcom's next online session is about "low risk" services.
I'll be tooting my thoughts in this thread.
Feel free to mute if you wish :)
[#]OnlineSafetyAct
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
"We haven't done a great deal of work about decentralised services in detail".
We can't give you a specific answer to who the provider might be.
(I fear "we can't help with that" will be a common theme.)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
Nope. Skipped over that.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
An excellent question from @cyberleagle, which Ofcom's webinar system has mangled badly:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
Ofcom is using an example of a "small gaming service" with "around 15,000 monthly UK users".
I wonder if Ofcom recognises that many of the people worrying about the OSA are talking about services with 0.1% of that userbase?!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
Even if low risk, you must have:
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
@neil I'd be particularly interested to know about things like private messaging systems on forums: is giving people the ability to report content in a private messages system enough for "ability to review", or would it oblige service providers to be able to easily read every message?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from JubalBarca@scholar.social
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).