Ancestors

Written by David Gerard on 2025-02-03 at 00:51

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 9th February 2025

https://awful.systems/post/3436005

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dgerard@awful.systems

Written by slopjockey@awful.systems on 2025-02-03 at 16:56

The blue check reaction to the totally cracked treasury zoomers showcases a complete rejection of the importance of domain knowledge. It’s 10x software engineer syndrome metastasized.

They’re saying that the ice cream hair kid - who has never worked on a real world system because he’s STILL IN COLLEGE - is going to do us proud because he translated a greek scroll in high school? Good for him, but so what? Ben Carson split babies in half like Solomon and he’s still a moron.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from slopjockey@awful.systems

Written by Soyweiser@awful.systems on 2025-02-03 at 17:29

Don’t worry they will use ChatGPT to learn all the COBOL they need.

(One of my pet peeves in software is bad documentation (always fun when the comments and the documentation contradict, and after an hour of digging through the email archives you discover both are wrong, and nobody every cared to update either, as the email was enough), but lol if that is what saves the US gov (and look at how bad it has gotten, I’m rooting for the US gov now. If I ever want to be seen as worthwhile I will try to hire Musk to get mad at me, it worked for Zuck (a little bit))).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Soyweiser@awful.systems

Written by nightsky@awful.systems on 2025-02-03 at 18:58

Don’t worry they will use ChatGPT to learn all the COBOL they need.

Oh why would they. They will just rewrite it from scratch in a weekend, right? And reading the original code would only pollute the mind with historic knowledge, and that stands in the way of disruptive innovation.

(btw I appreciate your correctly nested parentheses.)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nightsky@awful.systems

Written by Soyweiser@awful.systems on 2025-02-03 at 19:38

(btw I appreciate your correctly nested parentheses.)

I once fucked those up and people got mad. (I kid, they pointed out I usually use them correctly). I mostly use parentheses to note that im going a bit offtrack, which keeps happening, it is a bad habit.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Soyweiser@awful.systems

Written by zogwarg@awful.systems on 2025-02-04 at 08:53

Myself I’ve learned to embrace the em dash—like so, with a special shoutout to to John Green—and interleaving ( [ { } ] ).

On mac and linux conveniently short-cutted to Option+Shift+‘-’, windows is a much less satisfying Alt+0150 without third party tools like AutoHotKey.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from zogwarg@awful.systems

Written by khalid_salad on 2025-02-04 at 19:57

I write – for “en dash” and — for “em dash” and I end up looking like an asshole in emails a lot. However, they appear to work correctly here:

en: – en: –

em: — em: —

Also, Gnome Characters can be useful, though I have been looking for a good replacement.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from khalid_salad@awful.systems

Written by nightsky@awful.systems on 2025-02-04 at 20:32

I like to use – in plain text too! LaTeX user high five…?

Although I read somewhere recently that some people consider usage of em-dashes as a sign of AI-generated text. Oh well.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nightsky@awful.systems

Toot

Written by khalid_salad on 2025-02-04 at 22:50

LaTeX user high five…?

I need to finish crying over all my underfull hboxes, can we high-five in the evening?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from khalid_salad@awful.systems

Descendants