You nailed it @AuthorJMac ! 🖖
Edit : Original (and complete) post on March 29, 2024
« You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction.
I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes. »
Cf. https://indiepocalypse.social/@AuthorJMac/112178826967890119
[#]AI #IA #LLM
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from danslerush@floss.social
@danslerush @AuthorJMac Thank you, I was searching the source of this quote !
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from CedricLevasseur@framapiaf.org
@CedricLevasseur @danslerush @AuthorJMac I have one useful application for AI that is also my main use case:
I don't get much of AI creating anything "new" for me because I do actually new stuff. It costs me time because even if AI generates me something I would need to go it through and I end up dissapointing result that I need to rewrite myself.
I've also empirically tested these theories because I don't believe in belief systems.
E.g. a platform bug makes it propose solutions that don't work because there's too many parameters that are not the source code per se like the environment it runs, and how people might want it to fly. If I give more feedback to the AI, it always ends up eventually proposing the same dysfunctional solution I started with.
But my first example: it s actually useful. I also know a startup that did a system for customer service, which does not replace it but instead quickly provides context information for the call service person, which makes the work less stressful and customers get highest possible result. Nobody likes to talk AI on phone.
Whenever there is a new tech it will take all our jobs but eventually it settles and integrates. E.g. if AI really did that it would start feeding back itself with its own data because everything would be generated by AI. Even some studies have started to shown evidence that this can cause a feedback alzheimer kind of condition for the LLM.
I did my homework on this. Thus, not worried.
:-)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jarkko@social.kernel.org
@CedricLevasseur @AuthorJMac @danslerush E.g. software engineering: at most 10% is about the source code. Rest is human interaction and expectations, even in something as low-level as drivers and stuff like that.
I've always said that I would be as effective in statistics with Windows Notepad doing Linux drivers as I am on Linux system with vim even tho that will decrease my code productivity by factors. You pick the tools you like, the productivity and creativity are not affected. I personally love slow.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jarkko@social.kernel.org
@jarkko @danslerush @AuthorJMac
Then you'd better progressing in human interaction.
Because you use-case of "one useful" application in IA is totally irrelevant.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from CedricLevasseur@framapiaf.org
@CedricLevasseur @danslerush @AuthorJMac Dude, you should too.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jarkko@social.kernel.org
@CedricLevasseur @AuthorJMac @danslerush i use ai so rarely even in the use case i described that i even dont know what IA is. No interest on topic to ”do the research” either. I thought it was a typo
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jarkko@social.kernel.org
@jarkko It is a typo. It's because I'm French and in French IA means AI.
You understand that If i congratulate someone for an argument against AI, I'm not happy that somebody come and says : Hey for me it's working.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from CedricLevasseur@framapiaf.org This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini
