Ancestors

Toot

Written by Jukka Suomela on 2025-02-02 at 20:33

Sharing also some rejections… Here is a paper that was rejected from STOC 2025, but I don't mind that. We got very thorough and fair expert reviews, and I was happy to see that the reviewers liked this work, even if they weren't enthusiastic enough to recommend acceptance.

arxiv.org/abs/2407.05445

Shared Randomness Helps with L...

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jukkasuomela.fi@bsky.brid.gy

Descendants

Written by Jukka Suomela on 2025-02-02 at 20:33

Reviewer 1: "This is a very interesting complexity separation"

Reviewer 2: "I like that the result is surprising"

Reviewer 3: "The biggest strength of the paper is clearly the resolution of a natural question"

Thanks for the nice words to the anonymous reviewers, this made me smile. :)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from jukkasuomela.fi@bsky.brid.gy

Written by Sebastian Forster on 2025-02-05 at 08:47

@jukkasuomela.fi Hi Jukka! In such a case, would you see these reviews as a big enough "justification" for submitting to the next FOCS? I always find it a bit hard to give advice on how often it is "acceptable" in the community to try the same conference (or a conference of the same level).

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from forster@mathstodon.xyz