=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bruces@mastodon.social
@bruces these things are incredible https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dKN6XatdVkY
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pikesley@mastodon.me.uk
@bruces i love mechanical computing.
That became a Tech of Dead Roads like hypersonic
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MedeaVanamonde@chaosfem.tw
@bruces I really wanted to get one but then I saw the price. nope, I would rather spend that kind of money on another fountain pen or two and some interesting new ink :)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ia42@leftodon.social
@bruces I first encountered these in William Gibson's Pattern Recognition. Amazing machines. There is apparently a project afoot to build new ones based on the original drawings; no idea how far along they are, or whether it's going to happen.
https://curtaproject.com
EDIT: The sign-up option on that page doesn't seem to work, so ...
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mtconleyuk@mastodonapp.uk
@bruces https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_Recognition_(novel)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from billseitz@toolsforthought.social
@bruces Is it a pencil sharpener (I REMEMBER THOSE) or a hand grenade? I can't tell....
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elight@tenforward.social
@bruces I have always wanted one. They have always been more costly than my want. So cool!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RonJeffries@mastodon.social
@bruces Much more reliable results than with artificial hallucinating parrots.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mschomm@bonn.social
@bruces already done 😉
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lenzgr@mastodon.social
@bruces
In the Soviet Union the most famous mechanical calculator was Feliks M, named, of course, after Felix Dzerzhinsky. It was a copy of Swedish Odhner. Not a very reliable copy, at that; my mum was using one Feliks M. It was produced in big quantities until the end of the 1970s.
https://www.nzeldes.com/HOC/IronFelix.htm
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from svenvabar@mstdn.social
@bruces
A friend has one. Operating it is extraordinary. The feel and sounds it makes are like nothing else. It's wonderfully otherworldly.
Of course the story behind them is breathtaking and appalling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curta?wprov=sfla1
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org
@tomjennings @bruces
I have a Type 1. It worked fine when I first got it, but shortly thereafter developed a fault. The add/subtract slider moves, but now it only subtracts. I'm not willing to open it myself; I'll have to find an expert to fix it.
I'm going to try 3D printing the published (mostly) plastic 3x scale working model. The model maker says it wouldn't work in plastic at 1:1, which isn't too surprising.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social
@brouhaha
Wow nice! I imagine repair is 1) not easy and 2) expensive. But probably worth it, there's so few of them in the world.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org
@tomjennings
I'm pretty inept with mechanical things. Even if I can build the giant plastic one, and make it work, I won't try to repair a real Curta myself. It's widely reported that many new owners of Curta calculators, back in the day, took them apart out of curiosity, and were unable to reassemble them. I believe the factory had special jigs and tools.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social
@tomjennings
There are certainly some people in the community that have become experts at Curta repair, so someday I'll get it fixed.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social
@brouhaha
There's mental paradigms in mechanical things that is far more varied than software, theoretical stuff that can seem impossible to understand. Modern digital stuff is shockingly all similar in approach, but complexity can become far vaster.
I love mechanical thought systems, theres so many I can't puzzle them out and they might as well be alien. Diversity of thought and approach to solution is greater than in code in my experience.
Code, it's all sort of one dexterity to deal with it all. Source is always text. Subtle mechanicals are another story. Zuses computers used lots of sliding flat strips to make decisions. WW2 aircraft gunnery computers are ",classic" analog techniques but intermixed mechanical and electrics
Curta, it's all peculiar to the inside of his head. The shapes are the affordances that build operations.
It's so much less corporate sameness.
There's so much beauty in the Long Tailed Pair circuit it's breathtaking.
The sameness of design today is so boring, even though the capabilities are so high.
I always prefer the beauty over industrial advantage. That's why my car are so old, the alien problem solving is often beautiful.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org
@tomjennings @brouhaha Indeed. But I thought I was the last person alive that knew what a long-tailed pair was. Lol.
Analog design in the 70s was challenging and fun. And satisfying. Today, everything is so easy because the hard engineering has already been done for you. That's really cool too but there's no elegance to it and there's little satisfaction.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shuttersparks@qoto.org
@bruces I dearly wish I could.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shanecelis@mastodon.gamedev.place
@bruces get yours now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9uRckJLqLk
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mrcopilot@mstdn.social
@bruces
Oh no, a math grenade!!! XD
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rl_dane@polymaths.social
@rl_dane@polymaths.social @bruces@mastodon.social What is the number of the counting?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nowster@fedi.nowster.me.uk
@bruces "It will probably never wear out" is such passive low-confidence language we're not used from advertising of current time
lol
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from saxnot@chaos.social
@bruces It's on my list
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pixel@oldbytes.space
@bruces yeah these are a marvel. It's modern antikythera mechanism for future archeologists. Also who is a rallyist? Internet does not seem to know.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from enkiusz@is-a.cat This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini