Ancestors

Toot

Written by Bruce Sterling @bruces on 2025-01-29 at 16:07

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from bruces@mastodon.social

Descendants

Written by Guillotines for a Better World on 2025-01-29 at 16:08

@bruces these things are incredible https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dKN6XatdVkY

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pikesley@mastodon.me.uk

Written by Medea Vanamonde on 2025-01-29 at 16:09

@bruces i love mechanical computing.

That became a Tech of Dead Roads like hypersonic

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from MedeaVanamonde@chaosfem.tw

Written by Ira عيرا עירא 🎗️🏴 🇱🇧🕊️🇮🇱🕊️🇵🇸☮️ on 2025-01-29 at 16:12

@bruces I really wanted to get one but then I saw the price. nope, I would rather spend that kind of money on another fountain pen or two and some interesting new ink :)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ia42@leftodon.social

Written by mtconleyuk on 2025-01-29 at 16:33

@bruces I first encountered these in William Gibson's Pattern Recognition. Amazing machines. There is apparently a project afoot to build new ones based on the original drawings; no idea how far along they are, or whether it's going to happen.

https://curtaproject.com

EDIT: The sign-up option on that page doesn't seem to work, so ...

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mtconleyuk@mastodonapp.uk

Written by Bill Seitz on 2025-01-29 at 16:34

@bruces https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_Recognition_(novel)

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from billseitz@toolsforthought.social

Written by Evan Light on 2025-01-29 at 16:48

@bruces Is it a pencil sharpener (I REMEMBER THOSE) or a hand grenade? I can't tell....

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elight@tenforward.social

Written by Ron Jeffries on 2025-01-29 at 16:49

@bruces I have always wanted one. They have always been more costly than my want. So cool!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RonJeffries@mastodon.social

Written by mschomm on 2025-01-29 at 18:01

@bruces Much more reliable results than with artificial hallucinating parrots.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mschomm@bonn.social

Written by Lenz Grimmer on 2025-01-29 at 18:29

@bruces already done 😉

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from lenzgr@mastodon.social

Written by Sven Vabar on 2025-01-29 at 20:22

@bruces

In the Soviet Union the most famous mechanical calculator was Feliks M, named, of course, after Felix Dzerzhinsky. It was a copy of Swedish Odhner. Not a very reliable copy, at that; my mum was using one Feliks M. It was produced in big quantities until the end of the 1970s.

https://www.nzeldes.com/HOC/IronFelix.htm

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from svenvabar@mstdn.social

Written by tom jennings on 2025-01-29 at 23:03

@bruces

A friend has one. Operating it is extraordinary. The feel and sounds it makes are like nothing else. It's wonderfully otherworldly.

Of course the story behind them is breathtaking and appalling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curta?wprov=sfla1

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org

Written by 🇺🇦 haxadecimal on 2025-01-29 at 23:08

@tomjennings @bruces

I have a Type 1. It worked fine when I first got it, but shortly thereafter developed a fault. The add/subtract slider moves, but now it only subtracts. I'm not willing to open it myself; I'll have to find an expert to fix it.

I'm going to try 3D printing the published (mostly) plastic 3x scale working model. The model maker says it wouldn't work in plastic at 1:1, which isn't too surprising.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social

Written by tom jennings on 2025-01-29 at 23:17

@brouhaha

Wow nice! I imagine repair is 1) not easy and 2) expensive. But probably worth it, there's so few of them in the world.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org

Written by 🇺🇦 haxadecimal on 2025-01-29 at 23:22

@tomjennings

I'm pretty inept with mechanical things. Even if I can build the giant plastic one, and make it work, I won't try to repair a real Curta myself. It's widely reported that many new owners of Curta calculators, back in the day, took them apart out of curiosity, and were unable to reassemble them. I believe the factory had special jigs and tools.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social

Written by 🇺🇦 haxadecimal on 2025-01-29 at 23:23

@tomjennings

There are certainly some people in the community that have become experts at Curta repair, so someday I'll get it fixed.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from brouhaha@mastodon.social

Written by tom jennings on 2025-01-30 at 06:02

@brouhaha

There's mental paradigms in mechanical things that is far more varied than software, theoretical stuff that can seem impossible to understand. Modern digital stuff is shockingly all similar in approach, but complexity can become far vaster.

I love mechanical thought systems, theres so many I can't puzzle them out and they might as well be alien. Diversity of thought and approach to solution is greater than in code in my experience.

Code, it's all sort of one dexterity to deal with it all. Source is always text. Subtle mechanicals are another story. Zuses computers used lots of sliding flat strips to make decisions. WW2 aircraft gunnery computers are ",classic" analog techniques but intermixed mechanical and electrics

Curta, it's all peculiar to the inside of his head. The shapes are the affordances that build operations.

It's so much less corporate sameness.

There's so much beauty in the Long Tailed Pair circuit it's breathtaking.

The sameness of design today is so boring, even though the capabilities are so high.

I always prefer the beauty over industrial advantage. That's why my car are so old, the alien problem solving is often beautiful.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org

Written by Phil Landmeier on 2025-01-30 at 06:28

@tomjennings @brouhaha Indeed. But I thought I was the last person alive that knew what a long-tailed pair was. Lol.

Analog design in the 70s was challenging and fun. And satisfying. Today, everything is so easy because the hard engineering has already been done for you. That's really cool too but there's no elegance to it and there's little satisfaction.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shuttersparks@qoto.org

Written by Shane Celis on 2025-01-29 at 23:11

@bruces I dearly wish I could.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from shanecelis@mastodon.gamedev.place

Written by MrCopilot on 2025-01-29 at 23:20

@bruces get yours now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9uRckJLqLk

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mrcopilot@mstdn.social

Written by R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 on 2025-01-29 at 23:30

@bruces

Oh no, a math grenade!!! XD

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rl_dane@polymaths.social

Written by Paul Martin on 2025-01-30 at 00:38

@rl_dane@polymaths.social @bruces@mastodon.social What is the number of the counting?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nowster@fedi.nowster.me.uk

Written by saxnot on 2025-01-29 at 23:51

@bruces "It will probably never wear out" is such passive low-confidence language we're not used from advertising of current time

lol

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from saxnot@chaos.social

Written by Eric Vitiello on 2025-01-30 at 03:08

@bruces It's on my list

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pixel@oldbytes.space

Written by Enkiusz🇺🇦 on 2025-01-30 at 08:34

@bruces yeah these are a marvel. It's modern antikythera mechanism for future archeologists. Also who is a rallyist? Internet does not seem to know.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from enkiusz@is-a.cat

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113912504098105102
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
406.810256 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
9.379903 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).