Ancestors

Written by Kristopher Micinski on 2025-01-24 at 01:06

why is it the case that Trump can unilaterally fire any federal employee? Is this really the rule? This seems like an insane amount of power. For example, could Trump realistically fire anyone who, say, participated in DEI activities?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from krismicinski@types.pl

Written by Conor Mc Bride on 2025-01-24 at 01:08

@krismicinski because the supreme court decide what Trump is allowed to do and Trump decides who the supreme court are

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pigworker@types.pl

Written by Kristopher Micinski on 2025-01-24 at 01:09

@pigworker that is a potential answer, but I think it's a cheap one that might not practically hold up. It's hard to say, at least it would require it happening. I understand your point though, I just don't get logistically why the president is allowed to fire individual employees

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from krismicinski@types.pl

Written by Conor Mc Bride on 2025-01-24 at 01:10

@krismicinski call it cheap if you like;i'd call it you lot being useless at defending the rest of the world

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pigworker@types.pl

Written by Conor Mc Bride on 2025-01-24 at 01:13

@krismicinski please don't take that personally; that's just how it feels; match thrown

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from pigworker@types.pl

Toot

Written by Kristopher Micinski on 2025-01-24 at 14:59

@pigworker my reply last night didn't post, but it's all good. I agree with you

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from krismicinski@types.pl

Descendants

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113883925804474422
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
271.788097 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
0.921484 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).