I wrote a new article:
"The real problem with the AI hype"
https://wimvanderbauwhede.codeberg.page/articles/the-real-problem-with-AI/
tl;dr: even if the AI hype falls flat, it will have caused emissions to go up considerably.
The article has the best estimate I have been able to arrive at for the growth in global emissions from AI data centres.
[#]FrugalComputing
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e Thanks @janet for sharing. Super insightful - appreciate the depth of the research. I also found this article interesting: https://about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich-generative-ai-the-power-and-the-glory/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nwin@mastodon.ie
@nwin Thanks for the link. I think the main difference with the previous hypes is that there is a lot of government buy-in. I think that as a result it might take a bit longer to die out. But I would be really surprised it we saw 20% growth year on year for more than 5 years (that would already be bad enough)
@janet
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e Agreed. Even though Trump $500bn AI announcement had shades of Boris hospitals about it, it nevertheless illustrates your point nicely.
@janet
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nwin@mastodon.ie
@nwin @wim_v12e Whilst I think a lot of the generative AI side is indeed hype, there is unfortunately a lot of potential for automating relatively mundane surveillance functions (processing ANPR and CCTV footage, monitoring social media etc) and the datacentres will get used more and more for this (especially scraping large datasets to deal with offline), and the LLM/generative stuff can be used as a smokescreen..
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from vfrmedia@social.tchncs.de
@vfrmedia @nwin That's true. The LLMs are used to push the notion of AI, but it will undoubtedly lead to machine learning in general becoming even more widely used.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e @nwin LLM seems to be "bread and circuses" at the moment (I.e allow gammons on Facebook to make fake pictures of idealised life in 1970s), maybe govts will use it in public service to triage customer service queues rather than hire real humans, but setups like Starmers "pothole robot" are dual use (Police in England are already evaluating combined AI/ANPR cameras to check for lane deviations that suggest a driver is less than sober, but could also shows drivers dodging potholes)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from vfrmedia@social.tchncs.de
@wim_v12e
Thanks. That were very insightful calculations. Coarse, but with the advantage that it's possible to follow through.
And it's very nice to have the numbers in context! Very nice read indeed --
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from christian_zerfass@fediscience.org
@christian_zerfass
Thanks, that's why I did the rough estimate as well. The better model is too complicated to explain in a blog post. I'm in the process of writing a paper about it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from wim_v12e@scholar.social
@wim_v12e
Excellent. Good luck for the paper!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from christian_zerfass@fediscience.org This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini