In light of all the endless AI announcements pouring out of Governments lately ...
Why is it somehow impossible for a political party to put a general IT consultant on staff or retainer?
Not like one needs rockstar talent here. A slightly-jaded enterprise architect or infrastructure architect or manager with experience on the tools would do it.
Someone with a couple of support staff who can review a "bright idea" and explain exactly why that idea is a sack of shit before gulping it out to the public and looking like a fool.
At the very least, someone who can look at a proposed project and identify when a project is nominally good and when the entire thing has been designed to line the pockets of a series of vendors while delivering the minimal outcome.
$250k/yr spend seems cheap for being able to look vaguely smart on tech issues, right?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from PCOWandre@jauntygoat.net
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).