@tracketpacer hey, along the lines of "old ethernet tech" did you ever make a 10/100 ethernet vampire tap out of four keystone jacks and one length of cat5? I know they don't work with 1G ethernet (see @mossmann's throwing star LAN tap that had capacitors to knock the speed down to 100mbit)
One thing I always was curious about them was: why won't it !@#$ing work if you don't have the "monitor" interfaces connected?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xabean@infosec.exchange
@tracketpacer
My wild guess today now knowing a tiny bit more about electricity is that the vampire tap basically created a stub that caused reflections that fucks up signal integrity, and when you actually connect the monitoring interfaces to another NIC, the monitoring NIC actually consumes the reflection.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xabean@infosec.exchange
@xabean @tracketpacer Yeah, it's the stub. They usually work fine without the monitor cable connected at all. The bad reflection happens when there is a monitor cable connected on only one end (connected to the tap but not the monitor host).
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mossmann@mastodon.social
@mossmann @tracketpacer thank you for the confirmation!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from xabean@infosec.exchange This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini