our most prescriptivist opinion is that "assless chaps" is redundant because if they had an ass theyd be pants
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from atax1a@infosec.exchange
also: there aren't assed chaps
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from atax1a@infosec.exchange
@atax1a@infosec.exchange solid argument
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from smitten@key.portend.place
@atax1a If I haphazardly stitched a pair together that didn't fit right and would fall apart in a day, would they be half-assed chaps?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from trysdyn@electric.marf.space
@trysdyn yes but that's an entirely different kettle of corn
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from atax1a@infosec.exchange
@atax1a alternatively: chaps are only assless if they aren't being worn. if they are being worn, they're assful chaps
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from joe_no_body@mastodon.social
@joe_no_body assy chaps
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from atax1a@infosec.exchange
@atax1a afawct Dodgeball (2004) (awful movie) may be partially to blame for popularizing this redundant phrasing... a wretched legacy for any media to leave upon the earth
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Laevos@macaw.social This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini