In the last 5 years I have attended an uncountable number of meetings that people have recoroded. I have also missed an uncountable number of meetings that I couldn't attend, but they were recorded.
I have never gone back and reviewed a recorded meeting, whether it was one that I attended or not.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from paco@infosec.exchange
@paco I used to record TAB meetings at Cigital, build transcripts, and annotate the resulting text with actions, references, and commentary. Jennifer was instrumental in that process. The results were very useful for us.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from noplasticshower@infosec.exchange
@noplasticshower The average fluent English speaker reads around 300 wpm. A well-spoken, fluent speaker speaks around 120 wpm. I read transcripts all the time. I think transcripts can be super valuable. They are WAY more efficient with time, especially if someone does even the lightest editing to remove pointless sentences and pleasantries.
But I've never pulled up a recorded meeting and sat through the recording, even if I could play the recording at 1.5x or 2x. They're just not efficient with time.
I have watched recorded presentations even when they're not edited. But I always check for a transcript first. A presentation where someone spent some time thinking about what they'd say can often be worth it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from paco@infosec.exchange This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini