Why, the heck, does Google allow an ad to show a domain/URL that the advertiser does not control, while letting the ad actually link to another domain. What kind of twisted advertising process logic conspired to overrule the security review on this? agora.echelon.pl/objects/310d887d-e111-48a4-9331-bc9e6b8cdd3b
RE: agora.echelon.pl/objects/310d887d-e111-48a4-9331-bc9e6b8cdd3b
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from tilde@infosec.town
@tilde like allowing the link to be under the same eTLD+1 would seem… fine. but a totally different eTLD+1?!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from gsnedders@glauca.space
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).