Ancestors

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:27

Quantizing an image to 2 bits per color channel (64 colors). Dithering with 8x8 bayer (top) and FAST spatiotemporal blue noise (bottom).

Randomly offsetting bayer each frame, it doesn't converge.

That is weird.

The bayer matrix averages to 0.5 so is unbiased in that regard.

I think it must be due to Bayer having 1/64th values, while the blue noise has 1/256th values.

hmm...

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:29

Bayer totally bites it at 1 bit per pixel (8 colors), with a 2x4 matrix. FAST STBN works just fine.

(I'm working on a dithering & stippling blog post)

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:35

At 3 bits per color it doesn't converge either though. Still ugly banding in the sky. That's 512 values, so is 1/512. Something else must be going on.

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place

Written by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄) on 2025-01-20 at 20:36

@demofox

Something* needs to explicitly destroy the boundaries on Mach banding.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:38

@dougmerritt I thought Mach banding was just a perceptual effect, not a real thing.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place

Toot

Written by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄) on 2025-01-20 at 20:42

@demofox

I'm not sure it should be categorized that way. Like, is infrared a perceptual effect or real? Both.

The human eye+brain can spot the boundaries on e.g. the classic undithered 16 bit color gradual variation. They are really there, and it's a perceptual artifact, both.

With 24 bit undithered color, the boundaries may still be there, but the human eye+brain isn't sensitive enough to be there.

Are there any cases where they are perceived but not really there? Not that comes to mind, but we do have a human perception expert here if that matters to you. Not sure you should care.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz

Descendants

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:45

@dougmerritt Check this out, mach bands are purely illusion. There's an animated gif on the page showing the effect that is pretty wild.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_bands

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place

Written by DougMerritt (log😅 = 💧log😄) on 2025-01-20 at 20:47

@demofox

"What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet"

You're focusing on what to name it. You need to be focused on what will remove it from human perception.

It is Mach banding.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz

Written by demofox on 2025-01-20 at 20:49

@dougmerritt i don't think so. I'm uniform randomly offsetting the bayer matrix each frame and integrating. It's going to converge, or it won't. It's not converging.

The blue noise converges.

Trying to figure out where the bias is coming from.

Right side is the integrated version, left side is a single representative sample in the integration.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from demofox@mastodon.gamedev.place