🚨Nation-scale Matrix deployments will fail if built on the community version of Synapse.
The community version of Synapse is not designed or intended for use by commercial Matrix hosting providers to serve huge nation-scale deployments. Just as a suspension bridge has a weight limit and will collapse if you exceed it - the same goes for community Synapse.
Deployments supporting millions of users need Synapse Pro.
https://element.io/blog/scaling-to-millions-of-users-requires-synapse-pro/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from element@mastodon.matrix.org
@element As a tax payer I want my government to use open source. Since Synapse Pro isn't, it's simply not usable for such cases.
Thank you for detailing the need for doing the same development to the open source Synapse as you have already done on Synapse Pro. I hope you do agree, it would be a pity to have to fork.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from troed@ioc.exchange
@troed We'd also like everything to be open source. But the reality is that even with AGPL, we're still stuck in the pattern that enormous deployments use FOSS Synapse without contributing to its dev/maintenance costs.
Every time an opportunity that we're counting on to fund the team turns around and says "oh, FOSS Synapse is good enough, and we can use it for free, bye" we find ourselves needing to provide a very concrete reason not to freeride - hence Synapse Pro.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from element@mastodon.matrix.org
@element Would you be able to name a price if one such "nation-scale deployment" wanted to pay you to switch Synapse Pro to AGPL and maintain it as such for, say, 5 years?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis
@nemobis the funding gap we're try to plug for Synapse and associated Matrix dev is very roughly around $5M/y. So over 5 years, that'd be $25M.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from element@mastodon.matrix.org
@element Thanks! A very reasonable price if you ask me. Italy is planning to spend billions to supposedly secure their insecure military messaging at the network layer.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis
@element @nemobis 5 MEUR/yr for 5 years sounds small on the EU scale. One possibility would be to convince one of the ERICs, arguing that EU-scale-FOSS-Synapse is crucial to EU research infrastructure [1]. Another would be to convince EOSC that EU-scale-FOSS-Synapse satisfies "seamless access" and #FAIR in supporting research and justifies a 25 MEUR/5 yrs budget [2].
[1] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/our-digital-future/european-research-infrastructures/eric/eric-landscape_en
[2] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation/our-digital-future/open-science/european-open-science-cloud-eosc_en
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from boud@framapiaf.org
@boud @nemobis Interesting. @matrix tried to pitch for EDIC funding about a year ago, but it went nowhere - it looks EDIC is focused on funnelling money from EU->Govts rather than to projects. Meanwhile €5M/y is too big for NGI. Hadn't come across ERICs; will check. If we'd had baseline funding for Synapse dev we wouldn't be in this position.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from element@mastodon.matrix.org
@element You probably need to get help from an existing Matrix user who's involved in Horizon funding, otherwise this is impossibly hard. What about German healthcare?
The website https://gaia-x.eu/ got confusing, might still be worth joining.
Any project needs padding to cover the academic partners' fixed costs. Only GÉANT gets significant money for infrastructure https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101194278; in https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101147319 , https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101129751 the main suppliers get 2-10% of the pie.
@boud
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis
@element It would make sense to try coordinating with @edri for looking for EU-level or EU-national-member-level financing. The case for supporting matrix software development is strong, but administrative-political coordination is needed. EDRI should have some good ideas and practical knowledge.
@nemobis @ilumium
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from boud@framapiaf.org
@boud Well... https://edri.org/our-work/european-commission-cuts-funding-support-for-free-software-projects/
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis
@boud @element @edri @nemobis At EDRi we indeed advocate for much more EU funding for free and open source software that is part of the digital commons.
Just this week: https://edri.org/our-work/meta-and-x-are-going-rogue-here-is-what-europe-should-do-now/
We would love projects like the #Matrix Foundation to be on the receiving end of this. There is unfortunately heavy political resistance despite all the talk about #DigitalSovereignty.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from ilumium@eupolicy.social
@ilumium @boud @element @edri @nemobis Performance propriety can only work if it's protected by obscurity. I like neither side of that equation. Open-source with open funding is the way to go.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from promovicz@chaos.social
@element Virkkunen just (re)announced an "action plan to protect the health sector from cyberattacks".
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-unveils-action-plan-protect-health-sector-cyberattacks
Involves ENISA and Horizon, proposes a new "pan-European Cybersecurity Support Centre" and of course produces a consultation. I hope "cybersecurity maturity assessments" and "procurement guidelines" will cover whether doctors swap patient data in plain text from gmail (I've seen the best hospitals in Milan do it with cancer patients).
@ilumium @boud
[#]EU #HealthCare
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nemobis This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini