Earlier this week an opinion piece authored by me and a number of great colleagues was published on the @upstream blog. Our piece introduces criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases https://doi.org/10.54900/d3ck1-skq19.
We express our deep concerns about the treatment of @eLife by the #WebOfScience and #Scopus databases. We see this as an example of databases hindering rather than supporting innovation in scholarly communication and research assessment.
@cwts
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl
We urge stakeholders in the research system to work with innovation-friendly bibliographic databases. Examples of databases that are more supportive of innovation include #Dimensions, @OpenAlex and #EuropePMC, among others.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl
I very much enjoyed working together on this piece with colleagues associated with several reform initiatives: @DORAssessment, @CoARAssessment, #HELIOSOpen, @cOAlitionS_OA, @ASAPbio, @BarcelonaDORI, and others. Hope there will be more of these collaborations in the future!
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini