radxa has a new itx arm board that advertises uefi support, but looks like they still have a separate bsp type of situation going on with the ‘upcoming support os’?
smells fishy. maybe their uefi implementation is quirky
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from 40whirl@tech.lgbt
@40whirl What does separate bsp mean in this case?
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from boo_@im-in.space
@boo_ most of the time having a bsp linux means board-specific modified linux and u-boot and no effort to upstream the changes, not exactly great for a desktop platform (i think that’s what you’re asking?)
(i think the usage of the term bsp is okay? i’m not an embedded linux person)
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from 40whirl@tech.lgbt
@40whirl Me neither, I haven't encountered the term before, but it makes sense. Companies that make board-specific kernels without even trying to upstream can consider themselves my opps.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from boo_@im-in.space This content has been proxied by September (3851b).Proxy Information
text/gemini