Ancestors

Written by .:/ DiSCATTe :. 💾 ᓚᘏᗢ on 2024-12-23 at 03:26

Who's ready for PCMCIA mania to hit in 1995?? 📊

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from discatte@digipres.club

Written by Ryan Finnie on 2024-12-23 at 03:32

@discatte

=> View attached media

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from foo@fosstodon.org

Written by CatSalad🐈🥗 (D.Burch) :blobcatrainbow: on 2024-12-24 at 13:12

@foo @discatte Somebody was "optimistic"

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from catsalad@infosec.exchange

Written by Chris Bohn on 2024-12-24 at 14:07

@catsalad @foo @discatte If only Itanium development wasn't behind schedule. If only AMD didn't go off and make a 64-bit x86. If only...

If only Intel had partnered with Texas Instruments instead of HP, so they could name it TItanium.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DocBohn@techhub.social

Written by Sören on 2024-12-24 at 16:52

@DocBohn @catsalad @foo @discatte my understanding is Itanium bet heavily on compilers getting a lot better, and that happened much slower than Intel was hoping

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from chucker@norden.social

Toot

Written by Marsh Ray on 2024-12-24 at 23:06

@chucker @DocBohn @catsalad @foo @discatte It was also the beginning of the rise in gcc on the server, and it seemed like that compiler technology (to the extent it existed) may have been overly IP-encumbered.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marshray@infosec.exchange

Descendants

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113710307642091164
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
278.59435 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
1.424003 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).