Who's ready for PCMCIA mania to hit in 1995?? 📊
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from discatte@digipres.club
@discatte
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from foo@fosstodon.org
@foo @discatte Somebody was "optimistic"
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from catsalad@infosec.exchange
@catsalad @foo @discatte If only Itanium development wasn't behind schedule. If only AMD didn't go off and make a 64-bit x86. If only...
If only Intel had partnered with Texas Instruments instead of HP, so they could name it TItanium.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DocBohn@techhub.social
@DocBohn @catsalad @foo @discatte my understanding is Itanium bet heavily on compilers getting a lot better, and that happened much slower than Intel was hoping
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from chucker@norden.social
@chucker @DocBohn @catsalad @foo @discatte It was also the beginning of the rise in gcc on the server, and it seemed like that compiler technology (to the extent it existed) may have been overly IP-encumbered.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from marshray@infosec.exchange
text/gemini
This content has been proxied by September (3851b).