Ancestors

Written by Hackersquirrel on 2024-12-09 at 02:40

I had been told the story of the Anarchist Book Store with the sign "stop stealing the books". As if this shows how anarchists are sooo disrespectful.

I had to point out that no true #anarchist would retail #anarchism. It would have been a library to lend books using donations. Most anarchist literature is already free. And bookbinders, like myself, would help to make more.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hackersquirrel@gnulinux.social

Written by RadND on 2024-12-14 at 06:23

@hackersquirrel this makes me wonder how people participate in anarchism would make complicated stuff (things which emerged after the second industrial revolution) ,must be a very different timeline

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RadND@gnulinux.social

Written by Hackersquirrel on 2024-12-18 at 12:05

@RadND

I know what you mean. It makes me wonder how we could remake our tech to be both ecologicaly stable and local scale. We have to decide if we need our toilets and refrigerators to be on the internet.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hackersquirrel@gnulinux.social

Toot

Written by Hackersquirrel on 2024-12-18 at 12:09

@RadND

I think that demanding our existing tech to able to be repairable and focus on being upgradeable instead of disposable would be a good start.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hackersquirrel@gnulinux.social

Descendants

Written by RadND on 2024-12-20 at 00:55

@hackersquirrel my opinion

goverment/law demanding seller

SHOULD list specific information of product :

which part repairable?

which part replaceable?

which part upgradeable?

SHOULD list these info priority than functional or color prop

Cosumer choose what they want, whether or not they choose to buy a non-repairable product

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RadND@gnulinux.social

Written by Hackersquirrel on 2024-12-20 at 14:32

@RadND

It's important to have options but often the non-repairable will be produced in the cheapest way possible creating an incentive to get the most wasteful product.

Market efficiency is insanely wasteful.

Design efficiency, in the long run is both less wasteful and cheaper.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from hackersquirrel@gnulinux.social

Written by RadND on 2024-12-22 at 05:47

@hackersquirrel i want to know what you think is the difference between upgradeable and forward compatibility

i think forward compatibility sometimes can be done wrong and thus the same when (we try) to make product upgradeable.

i doubt there be one and only truth about upgradeable ,there might be some thing looks upgradeable , but after 10 years/mouth/sec turns out it not. so i dont like the idea of make the gov/law to forbid some ways of design at first place.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from RadND@gnulinux.social