Mastodon Now Sends Referer Headers! Hurrah!
https://piefed.social/post/372970
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from rimu@piefed.social
That doesn’t sound good? They are privacy invasive.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from solrize@lemmy.world
It’s the instance admins’ decision whether they want it or not.
Talk to your admins or move to another instance if you disagree with them
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from mitram2@lemmy.pt
I’m not personally affected since I don’t use Mastodon. That doesn’t make it a good idea.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from solrize@lemmy.world
I guess it depends on what you want. If you want to be totally anonymous on the internet, then it’s a bad idea. If you want people to use Mastodon, then it’s probably an OK one, since the way people use microblogging is to follow famous people, and famous people aren’t using Mastodon unless there’s evidence that there’s an audience there for them to play to.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from Kichae@lemmy.ca
It’s less a matter of anonymity as wanting to maintain some basic privacy. If you want to tell someone where you learned about something, that’s great, go ahead and tell them. To have them extract the info from you without your knowledge is dystopian. Referers should have been banned as soon as the web became commercial.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from solrize@lemmy.world
Having info “65 people visit this site from Lemmy.world” doesn’t seem to be that invasive tho.
I can see blogger and other creator utilize this to connect with community.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
The referer header tells the site which specific users and which specific clicks came from lemmy world. Revealing the number of users (as Mozilla wants to do) is also invasive even if it doesn’t single out the user. The thing to ask yourself is “site X wants information Y. What does X want to do with the information?”. If the answer can possibly be “something bad”, then should not get the information unless the user opts into sending it.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from solrize@lemmy.world
I see.
At least making them optional is good, especially for political context.
For creator related stuff, I can see instance like Misskey.design community benefitting from this tracker.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip This content has been proxied by September (ba2dc).Proxy Information
text/gemini