Ancestors

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:14

uh the Iceshrimp.net one duplicates its own handle when replying (probably bc of webfinger stuff?)

https://social2.test.elizabeth.sh/notes/a1hn4uv8kwcmyrbd

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt

Written by Fiona on 2024-12-07 at 11:20

@elizabeth@tech.lgbt Probably, different handles for the same account (@me@social2.test.elizabeth.sh/@me@2.test.elizabeth.sh). I've seen that with other servers where the "real" server has a different hostname than the intended account name, too.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from airtower@woem.men

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:21

@airtower it is that but the Sharkey instance (1.test.elizabeth.sh) handled it correctly

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt

Written by Fiona on 2024-12-07 at 11:31

@elizabeth@tech.lgbt Huh, right, there's a difference… From here (also Sharkey) @me@1.test.elizabeth.sh seems to be fine, while @me@2.test.elizabeth.sh shows up as @me@social2.test.elizabeth.sh. ​:neocat_think:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from airtower@woem.men

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:32

@airtower oh yeah that's because Misskey (and thus Sharkey) doesn't properly implement webfinger

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt

Written by Fiona on 2024-12-07 at 11:33

@elizabeth@tech.lgbt So it works between Sharkey/Misskey instances because they're broken in the same way? ​:neocat_googly_shocked:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from airtower@woem.men

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:34

@airtower no, keep in mind in this case 1.test.elizabeth.sh doesn't have split-domain set up (because there's no way to do that) and that's why it's displayed correctly, because it doesn't have any other domain in play

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt

Written by Fiona on 2024-12-07 at 11:35

@elizabeth@tech.lgbt Oh, I see. I had just assumed you did that the same way for both. ​:neocat_laugh_sweat:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from airtower@woem.men

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:35

@airtower I tried, but it ended up being not viable :(

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt

Toot

Written by Fiona on 2024-12-07 at 11:37

@elizabeth@tech.lgbt Mew… ​:neocat_floof_sad:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from airtower@woem.men

Descendants

Written by Elizabeth (kubekitten) on 2024-12-07 at 11:56

@airtower yes :blobcatpensive:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from elizabeth@tech.lgbt