I happened onto tales of the Montana Megaliths. Interesting, so I dug for more.
On the site dedicated to the MM's, I hit a BIG speedbump on the road to believing that any of the stone formations are anything but natural.
Come on, peeps, using a stock photo of a Russian megalithic structure to illustrate something you don't have a real photo of?
Lost me right there.
Without Confirmation Bias filters, rocks is rocks. Cool looking, but proving nothing. Except how cool rocks are.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from matera@mastodon.sdf.org
Why ruin your argument with a stock photo with no captioning, no explanation, no citing of source? The photo as presented is not only irrelevant, it seems to be there to createa false Oh Wow feeling in the viewer to reinforce biased empty claims. So it's a lie.
The Tizer Dolmen, a notable stone formation in the Giant's Playground area, is remarkabe, but I can imagine how it could have been left by earthquake or glacier, avalanche and erosion, like so many other strange stone groups.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from matera@mastodon.sdf.org
The site tries hard to prove - with no tangible proof - that the stone outcrops and odd piles are man-made.
While admitting thatThere. Are. No. Artifacts.
Real megalithic sites are an archaeologist's wet dream, with whole and broken tools, cooking hearths, post pits, pots, beads bones and whatnot.
Rocks is rocks. Human narcissistic need puffs everything up into empty bubbles of human importance.
=> More informations about this toot | More toots from matera@mastodon.sdf.org
text/geminiThis content has been proxied by September (3851b).