Ancestors

Toot

Written by Mythic Beasts on 2024-11-26 at 15:33

We went to the #IPv6 council meeting in the UK. In a change from previous years there was a lot from networks which mostly run IPv6 with IPv4 now increasingly being a legacy compatibility option. https://www.mythic-beasts.com/blog/2024/11/26/ipv6-networking-in-the-uk/

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from beasts@social.mythic-beasts.com

Descendants

Written by Albert Cardona on 2024-11-26 at 15:39

@beasts How would broader, more open #IPv6 adoption affect e.g., web use? Can we safely assume DNS will hide IPv6 addresses as seamlessly as it hides IPv4 now?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

Written by goetz 🚲 on 2024-11-26 at 15:45

@albertcardona

End to end communication, no translation, as you read in the sky example, probably faster. DNS will hide addresses.

@beasts

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from goetz@chaos.social

Written by Mythic Beasts on 2024-11-26 at 15:52

@albertcardona IPv4 path might be sub-optimal because you have to be brought to a central point to share your public IP with other network users. IPv6 can just let the network pick the best path end to end, and you have no NAT boxes doing translation in the middle.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from beasts@social.mythic-beasts.com

Written by Mythic Beasts on 2024-11-26 at 15:54

@albertcardona we can have this now. We've a NAT64 service in each zone, if it's offline for maintenance you get rerouted to another zone, which if you're in Amsterdam getting data from Amsterdam might involve a trip via London.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from beasts@social.mythic-beasts.com

Written by goetz 🚲 on 2024-11-26 at 15:41

@beasts

Thank you for the post and the summary.

May I propose to reword "fake" to "synthesized" an "clatd" to "CLAT".

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from goetz@chaos.social

Written by Mythic Beasts on 2024-11-26 at 17:56

@goetz Yes, thanks!

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from beasts@social.mythic-beasts.com

Written by Gary Parker on 2024-11-26 at 17:00

@beasts let me guess: absolute silence from Virgin Media/Liberty Global, as per usual?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from WiteWulf@cyberplace.social

Written by Alex Haydock on 2024-11-27 at 15:23

@beasts I see you reference Microsoft stating at the meeting that they can see now that they should have delivered DHCP Op108/CLAT support earlier.

Did they give any indication on timelines/roadmap for that one? I had hoped for it in the latest Windows 11 update but it didn’t show up :blob_cry:

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from alexhaydock@infosec.exchange

Proxy Information
Original URL
gemini://mastogem.picasoft.net/thread/113549981053798823
Status Code
Success (20)
Meta
text/gemini
Capsule Response Time
301.394029 milliseconds
Gemini-to-HTML Time
2.120457 milliseconds

This content has been proxied by September (3851b).