Ancestors

Written by The Stallman report on 2024-10-14 at 12:06

We, the anonymous editors of the Stallman report, have published our investigation of Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation today to a general audience:

https://stallman-report.org

Our report exhaustively catalogues, analyzes, and offers a rebuttal of Richard Stallman's political program of sexual violence, catalogues credible allegations of misconduct, and documents the misconduct of the #FSF circa 2019 and 2021. Please read and share our work.

Boosts encouraged.

[#]freesoftware

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from report_press@mastodon.social

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 12:30

@report_press@mastodon.social It's been nearly 4 years since the open letter failed to achieve anything.

Get over it, bruh.

​:gnujihad:​

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 12:53

@report_press@mastodon.social Can I also just say that personally attacking people through an anonymous report is also a very lame thing to do?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by The Original Stripey Goodness on 2024-10-14 at 12:56

@SuperDicq @report_press defending a known sex pest though, that's supa-coo 🙄

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from stripey@meow.social

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 13:04

@stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social "known sex pest"

Having some controversial political opinions and that one Betsy story from 45 years ago are pretty far from being a sex pest.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dave Wilburn :donor: on 2024-10-14 at 13:45

@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

What controversial political opinions are you referring to?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 13:50

@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social The same old quotes about things that are generally considered socially unacceptable to merely disagree on with the rest of society like age of consent and pornography.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Written by Dave Wilburn :donor: on 2024-10-14 at 13:53

@SuperDicq @stripey @report_press

I see, so you think that the question of whether grownups should be able to have sex with children is just something that we might respectfully "merely disagree" on?

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange

Written by SuperDicq on 2024-10-14 at 14:06

@DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @stripey@meow.social @report_press@mastodon.social No, that's not what I'm saying at all.

A lot of people (including you apparently) are literally incapable of having a civil political discussion around the laws that govern sex without immediately painting the other side of the argument as disgusting pedophiles or something. There is a huge taboo around even discussing these things!

Like for example what should be proper age of consent? Should it be 16, 17, 18, or maybe even 21? If your answer differs only slightly from the norm in your region of the world you will be called a pedophile guaranteed.

Same when it comes to the banning of pornography that includes animals for example. We should be able to have a civil discussion if the criminalization of possession of these types of pornography can be considered censorship while keeping subjective morals of doing so in the first place about this out of the discussion.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

Toot

Written by Orman on 2024-10-14 at 15:24

@SuperDicq @stripey @DaveMWilburn @report_press you'd have much better luck with a "civil political discussion" about the general age of consent if you weren't talking about it in the context of RMS defending people who are unambiguously adults engaging with people who are under 18. You must think we're stupid, trying to pretend that you're making a abstract, general point when the other side of your mouth is protesting he doesn't deserve the backlash for very specific opinions

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from orman@furry.engineer

Descendants

Written by Kevin Karhan :verified: on 2024-10-15 at 00:29

@suqdiq @orman @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @stripey @DaveMWilburn @report_press you too should please seek some professional help as well...

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kkarhan@infosec.space

Written by Kevin Karhan :verified: on 2024-10-15 at 12:48

@suqdiq @orman @stripey @DaveMWilburn @report_press

Well, I'm not a U.S. citizen and child marriages are not just illegal in my juristiction but also retroactively null and void per law.

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kkarhan@infosec.space

Written by Kevin Karhan :verified: on 2024-10-15 at 13:27

@suqdiq @orman @stripey @DaveMWilburn @report_press You clearly and purposefully misinterpret stuff to project things.

Also it's not that simple, but I have neither the spoons nor am I in mood to argue with someone on the internet who's clearly arguing in bad faith and should get their facts from a licensed lawyer at their sole expense instead...

Again, make.of that what you will: RMS is a pedo simpathizer and I think that minors should't be allowed to get married - period!

[#]EOD #thxbye #next

=> More informations about this toot | More toots from kkarhan@infosec.space